2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2016.07.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NUTRISCORE: A new nutritional screening tool for oncological outpatients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
64
2
8

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
64
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Between 1999 and 2017, the MST was validated in acute, long-term, rehabilitation, and ambulatory care and oncology clinics in at least nine different countries. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] These studies revealed that the MST exhibited a moderate degree of validity, a moderate degree of agreement, and a moderate degree of inter-rater reliability in identifying malnutrition risk in adults ( Figure 2). The strength of evidence for the MST is Grade I, good/ strong with good generalizability.…”
Section: Positionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between 1999 and 2017, the MST was validated in acute, long-term, rehabilitation, and ambulatory care and oncology clinics in at least nine different countries. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] These studies revealed that the MST exhibited a moderate degree of validity, a moderate degree of agreement, and a moderate degree of inter-rater reliability in identifying malnutrition risk in adults ( Figure 2). The strength of evidence for the MST is Grade I, good/ strong with good generalizability.…”
Section: Positionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these patients, malnutrition has a multifactorial origin, due to problems with chewing and swallowing secondary to the disease itself, treatment-related toxicity, and malnutrition in relation to alcohol abuse. 10 Therefore, a complete nutritional assessment is essential since it has been shown that nutritional impairment has a negative impact on clinical outcomes. 11–13 It is worth noting that the presence of an inflammatory response may contribute to the development of cancer-associated malnutrition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Many interraterreliability tests have been conducted on NSTs to evaluate reliability by comparing the results produced by dietitians and nurses or by different dietitians. [31][32][33][34][35][36][37] For example, in a study conducted in Tehran hospital, Mirmiran et al 38 evaluated the interrater reliability among nurses and reported that when the nurses used a British NST on 446 patients, it had a sensitivity of 86.7% and specificity of 61.7% when compared with nutrition assessments such as BMI, triceps skinfold thickness, mid-upper arm circumference, mid-arm muscle circumference, weight loss, and decreased dietary intake. In their study, the interrater reliability of the screening tool was interpreted as substantial as κ = 0.68 and κ = 0.74 on the first and second days, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%