2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12979-016-0069-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutrition, aging and cancer: lessons from dietary intervention studies

Abstract: There is convincing epidemiological and clinical evidence that, independent of aging, lifestyle and, notably, nutrition are associated with development or progression of major human cancers, including breast, prostate, colorectal tumors, and an increasingly large collection of diet-related cancers. Mechanisms underlying this association are mostly related to the distinct epigenetic effects of different dietary patterns. In this context, Mediterranean diet has been reported to significantly reduce mortality rat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Aging is an eternal theme in human life and many people seek a return to their youth, or at least a way of slowing the aging process. Aging is a complicated process, and many pathological changes are involved, including dysfunctional cell metabolism, the attenuation of host defenses, and memory loss [1][2][3] Consequently, aging can lead to various diseases, such as cancer, diabetes, and myopathy [4,5]. Although much progress has been made in anti-aging research, this mysterious process is not fully understood, and new therapeutic targets are urgently needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aging is an eternal theme in human life and many people seek a return to their youth, or at least a way of slowing the aging process. Aging is a complicated process, and many pathological changes are involved, including dysfunctional cell metabolism, the attenuation of host defenses, and memory loss [1][2][3] Consequently, aging can lead to various diseases, such as cancer, diabetes, and myopathy [4,5]. Although much progress has been made in anti-aging research, this mysterious process is not fully understood, and new therapeutic targets are urgently needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The promotion of healthy and sustainable diets is one of major actions prioritized in European research agenda for supporting public health and citizens' wellbeing. Several evidences proved that some foods or food ingredients, including living microbial cells contained therein, can enhance short-term wellbeing and reduce initiation and/or progression of non-diseases and the associated chronic conditions (e.g., musculoskeletal disorders, cardiovascular diseases and stroke, hypertension, obesity, type II diabetes mellitus (T2D), cancers, or mental health conditions) [1,2]. In view of the importance of nutrition in health promotion, academia and the food industry face the new challenge to tailor novel strategies and products that better contribute to human welfare as well as reducing the risk of insurgence of specific pathologies [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Healthy aging and component of healthy aging, according to Alternative Healthy Eating Index-2010: Healthy aging: OR = 1.34 (95% CI: 1.09-1.66, p < 0.001) for higher vs. lower quintile; No chronic disease: OR = 1.01 (95% CI: 0.97-1.05, p = 0.26) for higher vs. lower quintile; No cognitive impairment: OR = 0.99 (95% CI: 0.97-1.01, p = 0.09) for higher vs. lower quintile; No impairment of physical function: OR = 1.23 (95% CI: 1.11-1.36, p < 0.001) for higher vs. lower quintile; No limitation of mental health: OR = 1.13 (95% CI: 1.05-1.22, p < 0.001) for higher vs. lower quintile; Healthy aging and component of healthy aging, according to MD: Healthy aging: OR = 1.46 (95% CI: 1.17-1.83, p = 0.0022) for higher vs. lower quintile; No chronic disease: OR = 1.04 (95% CI: 1.00-1.09, p = 0.13) for higher vs. lower quintile; No cognitive impairment: OR = 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95-1.00, p = 0.02) for higher vs. lower quintile; No impairment of physical function: OR = 1.14 (95% CI: 1.03-1.26, p = 0.005) for higher vs. Hazard ratios for all-cause mortality: HR = 0.73 (95% CI: 0.68-0.77, p < 0.01) for physical activity vs. no physical activity; HR = 0.85 (95% CI: 0.77-0.92, p < 0.01) for daily fruit intake; HR = 0.74 (95% CI: 0.66-0.83, p < 0.01) for daily vegetable intake; HR = 1.05 (95% CI: 0.97-1.14, p > 0.05) for daily meat intake; HR = 1.06 (95% CI: 1.00-1.13, p < 0.05) for occasionally fish intake; HR = 1.04 (95% CI: 0.97-1.12, p > 0.05) for daily sugar intake; HR = 1.10 (95% CI: 1.03-1.18, p < 0.01) for daily salt-preserved vegetable intake Nutrients 2020, 12, 35 20 of 34 It has been confirmed by substantial evidence that MD reduces mortality from many chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular diseases, neurodegenerative diseases and even cancer [117]. All this is due to the synergistic action of the different nutritional elements of the MD.…”
Section: Author and Year Of Publication Study Design Sample Size Riskmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…From a strictly biological point of view, there is a lot of evidence that show how nutrition works by modulating numerous interconnected cellular processes, implicated both in carcinogenesis and in inflammatory responses, or in the production of free radicals, or in the expression of inflammatory cytokines and the eicosanoid pathway [122], for example through the down-regulation of gene expression of the NF-κB transcription factor. The MD can also have a positive impact on the so-called "inflammaging" through the epigenetic mechanism (which includes chromatin remodeling, DNA methylation and miRNAs) or through the preservation of intestinal microbiota homeostasis [117].…”
Section: Author and Year Of Publication Study Design Sample Size Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%