2020
DOI: 10.3390/foods10010060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutrition in Disguise: Effects of Food Neophobia, Healthy Eating Interests and Provision of Health Information on Liking and Perceptions of Nutrient-Dense Foods in Older Adults

Abstract: Older adults (60+ years) are at higher risk of malnutrition. Improving the nutrient-density of their diets is important but presents challenges due to the introduction of new ingredients, liking implications and heterogeneity of older consumers. Ten nutrient-enhanced foods were evaluated for liking (9-point hedonic scale) and sensory perception (check-all-that-apply) by 71 older adults. Three foods were re-evaluated after participants were provided with information about their healthy ingredients and benefits.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the categorisation of FNS scores differed significantly between studies. For example, some researchers (2,(14)(15)(16) classified individuals as neophilic or neophobic based on their FNS scores being below or above the mean/median of the study sample, and some (17) used half of the maximum FNS score (35 points). Some authors (6,18,19) used tertiles, some (20,21) used percentiles, some (8,13,(22)(23)(24)(25)(26) used means with standard deviations and some (7) used three equal intervals of the FNS score (10-30, 30-50 and 50-70 points) to categorise food neophobia as low, moderate or high.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the categorisation of FNS scores differed significantly between studies. For example, some researchers (2,(14)(15)(16) classified individuals as neophilic or neophobic based on their FNS scores being below or above the mean/median of the study sample, and some (17) used half of the maximum FNS score (35 points). Some authors (6,18,19) used tertiles, some (20,21) used percentiles, some (8,13,(22)(23)(24)(25)(26) used means with standard deviations and some (7) used three equal intervals of the FNS score (10-30, 30-50 and 50-70 points) to categorise food neophobia as low, moderate or high.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, Birch et al suggested that repeated exposure to unfamiliar foods can lead to a change in familiarity, and that more frequent opportunities to do so represent a strategy to reduce the effects of food neophobia [ 8 , 38 ]. In older adults with food neophobia, providing health information on novel foods may increase food preference [ 39 ]. As food intake and nonintake are affected by a complex interplay of innate human nature and individual experiences, it is necessary to understand the level of individual food neophobia to provide specific and adequate support for effective intervention methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bottom line is that there are multiple layers of complexities when optimising foods aligned with the CFG, shifting to foods with anti-inflammatory potential for enhanced health benefits, while balancing food and fluid offerings which supports a sufficient energy and protein to prevent malnutrition. Appropriately designed education for residents around healthy food choices may also help facilitate synergistic behaviour change [ 50 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%