“…Out of the 38 studies selected for review, 60.5% ( n = 23) analyzed the EFSA (Aggett, , , ; Asp & Bryngelsson, ; Biesalski, Aggett, & Anton, ; Buttriss, ; Buttriss & Benelam, ; Coppens, , ; Flynn, ; Gilsenan, ; Gorny, ; Kardinaal, Mennen, & Hendriks, ; Lalor & Wall, ; Mitchell, Aggett, Richardson, Stowell, ; O'Connor, ; Reuterswärd, ; Richardson, ; Vero & Gasbarrini, ; Walter, ; Pravst, ; Meisterernst & Haber, ; Gallagher, Meijer, & Richardson, ); a total of 23.7% ( n = 9) analyzed the FDA (Aggett, Hathcock, & Jukes, ; Ellwood et al., ; FDA, 2009; Guzelian & Guzelian, ; Hasler, ; Kuhn, ; Lupton, ; Schneeman, , ) and 15.8% ( n = 6) were comparative analyses of both agencies (Binns, ; Jovicic et al., ; Lalor & Wall, ; Martin, ; Moors, ; Verhagen, Vos, Franch, Heinonen, & van Loveren, ). Of the authors whose articles were selected for review, only four were somewhat affiliated with the agencies they analyzed (Ellwood et al., ; FDA, 2009; Schneeman, , ).…”