Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
BackgroundChildren who are critically ill are often reliant on enteral and oral nutrition support. However, there is limited evidence to guide “what” to prescribe, and current practice is unknown. The primary objective of this study was to describe enteral nutrition prescription in children ≤2 years of age in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). The secondary objectives were to describe oral nutrition support practices and factors associated with the use of increased energy and protein density nutrition support.MethodsChildren ≤2 years of age admitted to participating PICUs over a 2‐week period in June 2021 were enrolled. Data were collected on PICU admission days 1 to 7, 14, 21, and 28 on the mode of nutrition, enteral and oral nutrition support prescription, and dietitian intervention.ResultsEighty‐four children were included (49 [58%] male; 79 [94%] ≤1 year of age). Enteral nutrition was administered to 79 (94%) children (with expressed breast milk in 45 [57%]). Forty‐three children received formula as enteral nutrition. Increased energy and protein density formulas were provided to 14 (33%) children enterally, with concentrated standard infant formula powder being the most common (5 [12%]). Among children offered oral intake (22; 26%), three (14%) received oral nutrition support. Children who received increased energy and protein density enteral nutrition were more likely to receive dietitian intervention (P = 0.002).ConclusionIn children ≤2 years of age admitted to PICU, expressed breast milk was provided to half of those requiring enteral nutrition and oral nutrition support prescription was infrequent. One third of children receiving formula via enteral nutrition received an increased energy and protein density feed, and this was strongly associated with dietitian intervention.
BackgroundChildren who are critically ill are often reliant on enteral and oral nutrition support. However, there is limited evidence to guide “what” to prescribe, and current practice is unknown. The primary objective of this study was to describe enteral nutrition prescription in children ≤2 years of age in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). The secondary objectives were to describe oral nutrition support practices and factors associated with the use of increased energy and protein density nutrition support.MethodsChildren ≤2 years of age admitted to participating PICUs over a 2‐week period in June 2021 were enrolled. Data were collected on PICU admission days 1 to 7, 14, 21, and 28 on the mode of nutrition, enteral and oral nutrition support prescription, and dietitian intervention.ResultsEighty‐four children were included (49 [58%] male; 79 [94%] ≤1 year of age). Enteral nutrition was administered to 79 (94%) children (with expressed breast milk in 45 [57%]). Forty‐three children received formula as enteral nutrition. Increased energy and protein density formulas were provided to 14 (33%) children enterally, with concentrated standard infant formula powder being the most common (5 [12%]). Among children offered oral intake (22; 26%), three (14%) received oral nutrition support. Children who received increased energy and protein density enteral nutrition were more likely to receive dietitian intervention (P = 0.002).ConclusionIn children ≤2 years of age admitted to PICU, expressed breast milk was provided to half of those requiring enteral nutrition and oral nutrition support prescription was infrequent. One third of children receiving formula via enteral nutrition received an increased energy and protein density feed, and this was strongly associated with dietitian intervention.
ObjectivesThe role of nutrition in the recovery of critically ill children has not been investigated and current nutrition provision in the post‐pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) period is unknown. The primary objective of this study was to describe ward nutrition support in children following PICU discharge.MethodsChildren up to 18 years admitted to one of nine PICUs over a 2‐week period with a length of stay >48 h were enrolled. Data were collected on the first full ward day following PICU discharge and on Days 7, 14, 21, and 28 following PICU admission. Data points included oral intake, enteral (EN) and parenteral nutrition (PN) support, and oral and EN energy and protein provision.ResultsAmong the 108 children, on the first full ward day 75/108 (69%) children received EN, 54/108 (50%) oral intake, and 8/108 (7%) PN. Of those receiving oral nutrition only on the first full ward day (25/108; 23%), 9/25 (36%) received <50% of their estimated energy and protein requirements. Of those provided EN only, and where nutrition targets were known, on the first full ward day 8/46 (17%) and 7/46 (15%) met <75% of their estimated energy and protein requirements, respectively. On Day 28, this increased to 4/12 (33%) and 5/12 (42%).ConclusionsIn this study of ward‐based nutrition support, key findings included consistent use of EN and PN up to at least 28 days following PICU admission, and a high proportion of children receiving EN or oral intake only not meeting their estimated energy and protein requirements.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.