2010
DOI: 10.9755/ejfa.v22i5.4825
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutritional characterization of Cicer arietinum L. cultivars with respect to morphological and agronomic parameters

Abstract: Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is one of the grain legumes more interesting for its nutritional value and genetic improvement in order to resistance to Aschochyta rabiei, seeds weight and adaptation to mechanical harvesting. The aim of this research was the agronomic and qualitative characterization of 15 cultivars of chickpea. During the cultural cycle resistance and sensitiveness to Aschochyta rabiei were analyzed. At harvesting, grain yield and yields components were registered. Moreover, proximate compositi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
3
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The fatty acid profile of the chickpea accessions under analysis reveals that lipids are a good source of nutritionally essential linoleic and oleic acids. The linoleic acid was the dominating fatty acid, followed by oleic acid and palmitic acid, which is consistent with the results reported by De Falco et al (2010) and Shah et al (2013). The average content of omega-6 linoleic fatty acid is 61.0%, ranging from 54.5% for Kabuli accession No.…”
Section: Source Of Variationsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fatty acid profile of the chickpea accessions under analysis reveals that lipids are a good source of nutritionally essential linoleic and oleic acids. The linoleic acid was the dominating fatty acid, followed by oleic acid and palmitic acid, which is consistent with the results reported by De Falco et al (2010) and Shah et al (2013). The average content of omega-6 linoleic fatty acid is 61.0%, ranging from 54.5% for Kabuli accession No.…”
Section: Source Of Variationsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The screening of more than 16 000 accessions obtained from the global collection revealed a wide range of seed sizes (4-63 g of 100 seed weight) (Upadhyaya, 2003), and the results obtained through screening 179 genotypes ranged from 9.0 to 30 g (Ramanappa et al, 2013). For forty, fifteen and two Kabuli genotypes, the 100 seed weight values ranged from 33.5 to 42.5 g, from 28.1 to 56.6 g, and from 30.7 to 33.0 g, respectively (De Falco et al, 2010), and for the fourteen lines originating in Turkey the average 100 seed weight was 33.7 g (Yucel et al, 2006).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chickpea composition was consistent with previous reports for the same cultivar and for other chickpea Kabuli biotypes produced in different cultivation areas [16,17,40,41]. Despite the differences between the two protein feeds, the corresponding concentrate mixtures showed comparable protein contents, but the SP fraction remained higher (+ 47.3 g/kg DM) in the chickpea concentrate and, as a consequence, in the diet (+ 18.0 g/kg DM).…”
Section: Feeds Dry Matter Intake Body Weight (Bw) and Body Conditiosupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In contrast, some researchers have recorded negative correlations between GY and protein content in pulses like chickpea (Frimpong et al, 2009). Negative correlations were also observed between protein content and HSW in chickpea (Falco et al, 2010) and barley (Bouhlal et al, 2021). Our results showed also a wide range for different nutritional quality traits among the tested genotypes collection.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%