2022
DOI: 10.3390/plants11030377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutritional Composition, Bioactive Compounds, and Volatiles Profile Characterization of Two Edible Undervalued Plants: Portulaca oleracea L. and Porophyllum ruderale (Jacq.) Cass

Abstract: Wild edible plants are an important source of healthy food and have played an important role in traditional Mediterranean diets. In this paper, quality characteristics were typified in Portulaca oleracea L. and Porophyllum ruderale (Jacq.) Cass, undervalued plants inherent to the spring-summer season in the Valencian coastal region. Nutritional composition and bioactive compounds were analyzed and compared between plants in wild and organic cultivation conditions. Proximate analysis was carried out according t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
16
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In this investigation, HEPr was able to stabilize all radical species as well as to reduce the ferric ion to the ferrous state. Regarding DPPH activity, HEPr inhibits this radical in 63.06% and the radical inhibition of DPPH was 1502.40 ± 0.0407 µmol TE/100 g. These values are higher than that reported for an ethanolic extract of the same species (32.6 ± 1.18%, 676.24 ± 0.34 µmol ET/100 g) [40], but lesser than that obtained for wild and cultivated P. ruderale (4645.53 ± 36.2 and 4392.16 ± 27.0 µmol TE/100 g, respectively); however, in this case, fresh leaves were used [20].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In this investigation, HEPr was able to stabilize all radical species as well as to reduce the ferric ion to the ferrous state. Regarding DPPH activity, HEPr inhibits this radical in 63.06% and the radical inhibition of DPPH was 1502.40 ± 0.0407 µmol TE/100 g. These values are higher than that reported for an ethanolic extract of the same species (32.6 ± 1.18%, 676.24 ± 0.34 µmol ET/100 g) [40], but lesser than that obtained for wild and cultivated P. ruderale (4645.53 ± 36.2 and 4392.16 ± 27.0 µmol TE/100 g, respectively); however, in this case, fresh leaves were used [20].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…However, it was higher than the total phenol content in fresh leaves of wild and cultivated P. ruderale (3.91 ± 1.41 and 3.162 ± 0.28 mgGAE/g, respectively). The differences in the antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds content in P. ruderale aerial parts may be due to the growing conditions and edaphoclimatic characteristics of the respective geographical areas [20]. For instance, Fukalova et al [20] obtained P. ruderale from the Valencian coast in Spain; while Kato da Silva et al [44] obtained it from Campo Grande, MS, Brazil, and we obtained it from Hidalgo, México.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations