2021
DOI: 10.21897/rmvz.2119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutritional composition, nitrate and nitrite levels of Kikuyo grass and its influence on milk production.

Abstract: Objetive. Establish variations of nutritional composition and the contents of nitrates and nitrites in the Kikuyo grass (Cenchrus clandestinus (Hochst. Ex Chiov.) Morrone) from four veredas in the municipality of San Miguel de Sema: Peña Blanca, Sirigay, Sabaneca, and Quintoque, during dry and rainy seasons. were dairy production is the most significant economic activity. Material and methods. Nutritional characterization parameters, were associated a two-way ANOVA, using Tukey's as a multiple comparison test.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Elsewhere, Shah et al (2019) recorded the maximum and minimum NDF contents, respectively, in Thysanolaena maxima (79.22% DM) and Ficus semicordata (53.21% DM) in India. In the present study, the fiber content in P. clandestinum was observed to be 87.21% ± 1.33% DM, compared with 60.86% reported by Camacho‐Ospina et al (2021) for the same species in the municipality of San Miguel de Sema, Columbia. This difference may be explained by the variation in the soil composition and the physiological stage of the plants sampled.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…Elsewhere, Shah et al (2019) recorded the maximum and minimum NDF contents, respectively, in Thysanolaena maxima (79.22% DM) and Ficus semicordata (53.21% DM) in India. In the present study, the fiber content in P. clandestinum was observed to be 87.21% ± 1.33% DM, compared with 60.86% reported by Camacho‐Ospina et al (2021) for the same species in the municipality of San Miguel de Sema, Columbia. This difference may be explained by the variation in the soil composition and the physiological stage of the plants sampled.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%