1985
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(85)90432-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutritional effects of postgastrectomy reconstructions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 However, the small intestine could be viewed as a much larger reservoir for food than the stomach. Further, creating an intestinal reservoir after total gastrectomy, a so-called pouch reconstruction, did not increase postoperative food intake and body weight 3,30,47,48 and did not improve symptoms of eating dysfunction after gastrectomy. 30 Therefore, based on the data presented, not a lack of reservoir but rather early satiety due to a disturbed central regulation of food intake should be considered as a key factor for reduced food intake and body weight loss after total gastrectomy.…”
Section: Regulation Of Food Intake After Total Gastrectomy In Ratsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 However, the small intestine could be viewed as a much larger reservoir for food than the stomach. Further, creating an intestinal reservoir after total gastrectomy, a so-called pouch reconstruction, did not increase postoperative food intake and body weight 3,30,47,48 and did not improve symptoms of eating dysfunction after gastrectomy. 30 Therefore, based on the data presented, not a lack of reservoir but rather early satiety due to a disturbed central regulation of food intake should be considered as a key factor for reduced food intake and body weight loss after total gastrectomy.…”
Section: Regulation Of Food Intake After Total Gastrectomy In Ratsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is some controversy as to whether the reconstruction o f a pouch is actually needed to achieve this. One o f the objections, raised time and again, which asserts that the creation of a pouch could lead to an unnecessary increase in the risk of an operation already considered dangerous [26,31], has meanwhile been largely refuted, as our own results show also [7,[32][33][34][35][36][37], The additional 15-30 min needed, depend ing on whether the sutures are made by stapler [38,39] or by hand, are o f inferior significance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which reconstruction can (and must) meet, is the pre vention o f intestinal/bile reflux into the oesophagus. How ever, this objective is also obtainable through reconstruc tion without pouch formation, whether through a long (45 cm and more) jejunum interponate [23,24] or via sim ple oesophago-jejunostomy Y-en-Roux [25,26], The ome ga reconstruction, previously popular due to its simplicity (elevated jejunum loop with Braun's anastomosis) must be avoided at all cost today, because it leads to reflux oeso phagitis in more than 50% o f patients [27] and must there fore be considered as one o f the major causes o f the dreaded 'agastric syndrome' [28], There is also agreement in litera ture on the fact that an increase in weight and a subsequent improvement in the quality o f life depends to a large extent on the ability to ingest food portions of normal size [8, 29,30]; if successful, the above-mentioned metabolic defects are amenable to compensation. However, there is some controversy as to whether the reconstruction o f a pouch is actually needed to achieve this.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These disorders can become a serious disturbance for these patients. To reduce such symptoms, various types of reconstruction have been developed, with each providing major or minor benefits [1][2][3][4]. To date, there is little reliable evidence that jejunal interposition with or without a pouch promotes better patient quality of life [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%