1967
DOI: 10.1021/jf60150a011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutritional evaluation of milk processed for removal of cationic radionuclides. Chemical analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

1967
1967
1975
1975

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, gas chromatographic analysis has shown that the fatty acid composition of the milk fat was not changed by processing. These results are in agreement with those of Isaacks et al (1967). Table 6.…”
Section: Organic Constituentssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, gas chromatographic analysis has shown that the fatty acid composition of the milk fat was not changed by processing. These results are in agreement with those of Isaacks et al (1967). Table 6.…”
Section: Organic Constituentssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Appreciable losses were observed in thiamine, vitamin B 6 and nicotinie acid whose concentrations were reduced to 33, 85 and 73 % of their original values. Although removal of vitamin B 6 was not observed by Isaacks et al (1967) some loss during treatment was not unexpected as it is weakly basic and might therefore be exchanged for other cations on the resin. Thiamine is more strongly basic and the loss observed both in the present work and by Isaacks et al was most probably due to exchange on the resin.…”
Section: Toxic Metals Iron and Stable Strontiummentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In milk treated with Amberlite IR-120 for the removal of Sr, there were losses of 50% thiamine, 27% nicotinic acid and 15% vitamin B e (Isaacks et al 1967). No losses of riboflavin, pantothenic acid, folic acid or vitamin B 12 were found.…”
Section: Ion Exchange Resin Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Treatment of milk with an anion exchange resin (Dowex 2-X8) for the removal of 131 I did not affect the thiamine content, which was about equally distributed between free and bound forms in both the control and resin-treated milks (Barth et al 1970). Isaacks et al (1967), on the other hand, found that Amberlite IR-120 removed 86% of the free and 20 % of the bound thiamine.…”
Section: Ion Exchange Resin Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 97%