2023
DOI: 10.3390/nu15030727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutritional Interventions during Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review of Prospective Studies

Abstract: Background: Pancreatic cancer incidence is growing, but the prognosis for survival is still poor. Patients with pancreatic cancer often suffer from malnutrition and sarcopenia, two clinical conditions that negatively impact oncological clinical outcomes. The aim of this systematic review was to analyze the impact of different nutritional interventions on clinical outcomes in patients with pancreatic cancer during chemotherapy. Methods: A systematic review of MedLine, EMBASE, and Web of Science was carried out … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…25 Systematic reviews and meta-analyses evaluating the impact of EPI treatment with PERT have associated improved survival, quality of life, nutrition status, body composition, tolerance to treatment including chemotherapy, and gastrointestinal symptoms in PDAC with PERT being optimized, whereas untreated EPI has been associated with high mortality specifically after pancreatic surgery. 25,[31][32][33] Despite these reports, several randomized controlled trials fail to support these findings. 34 Indeed, a recent survey of surgical oncologists suggests that most prescribe PERT as part of multimodality treatment of PDAC, although <20% believe this has an effect on overall survival.…”
Section: Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…25 Systematic reviews and meta-analyses evaluating the impact of EPI treatment with PERT have associated improved survival, quality of life, nutrition status, body composition, tolerance to treatment including chemotherapy, and gastrointestinal symptoms in PDAC with PERT being optimized, whereas untreated EPI has been associated with high mortality specifically after pancreatic surgery. 25,[31][32][33] Despite these reports, several randomized controlled trials fail to support these findings. 34 Indeed, a recent survey of surgical oncologists suggests that most prescribe PERT as part of multimodality treatment of PDAC, although <20% believe this has an effect on overall survival.…”
Section: Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,48 However, despite the importance of this approach, there is limited evidence to guide individual management decisions. Evidence supports that PERT can improve fat absorption, decrease maldigestion and associated symptoms, increase survival, and improve quality of life in patients with EPI 25,32,49,50 ; however, the impact on nutrition outcomes is inconsistent. In 2017, Saito et al conducted a retrospective analysis of PERT use in a cohort of those with unresectable PDAC and found a higher body mass index was associated with PERT use (P < 0.001), but when they performed a prospective randomized controlled trial a year later, the authors found no differences in body weight 51 (P = 0.780) and even some weight loss reported with PERT use.…”
Section: Pancreas Enzyme Replacement Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nutritional interventions were performed in patients with several types of cancer or diseases, including pancreatic cancer [67], gastrointestinal cancer [68], liver cirrhosis [69], and CKD [70], to reduce sarcopenia and its complications.…”
Section: The Analysis Of Retrieved Articles 321 Sarcopenia and Nutritionmentioning
confidence: 99%