Nutritional interventions improve quality of life of caregivers of children with neurodevelopmental disorders

Ayça, Senem; Doğan, Güzide; Sapmaz, Şermin Yalın; Dündar, Pınar Erbay; Kasırga, Erhun; Polat, Muzaffer

doi:10.1080/1028415x.2019.1665853

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The VAS score is considered a global measure of health status [ 48 ] 1 [ 74 ] WHOQoL-BREF General 26-items HRQoL scale consisting of four domains (physical health, psychological, social, and environmental). Each domain is scored on a 5-point scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better QoL [ 75 ] 6 [ 76 – 81 ] PedsQoL General Instrument for assessing patients and parents’ perceptions of HRQoL in pediatric patients with chronic health conditions. Consists of a 15-item core measure of global HRQoL AND eight supplemental modules assessing specific symptoms or treatment domains [ 82 ] 2 [ 83 , 84 ] AQoL-8D General QoL questionnaire based in AQoL-6D questionnaire which adds explicit dimensions for self-worth and happiness and expands the items in mental health [ 85 – 87 ] 2 [ 88 , 89 ] AQoL-6D General QoL questionnaire based in AQoL-4D questionnaire were.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

How quality of life is measured in studies of nutritional intervention: a systematic review

Pemau,

González-Palacios,

Kerr

2024

Health Qual Life Outcomes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Nutrition care can positively affect multiple aspects of patient’s health; outcomes are commonly evaluated on the basis of their impact on a patient’s (i) illness-specific conditions and (ii) health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Our systematic review examined how HRQoL was measured in studies of nutritional interventions. To help future researchers select appropriate Quality of Life Questionnaires (QoLQ), we identified commonly-used instruments and their uses across populations in different regions, of different ages, and with different diseases. Methods We searched EMCare, EMBASE, and Medline databases for studies that had HRQoL and nutrition intervention terms in the title, the abstract, or the MeSH term classifications “quality of life” and any of “nutrition therapy”, “diet therapy”, or “dietary supplements” and identified 1,113 studies for possible inclusion.We then reviewed titles, abstracts, and full texts to identify studies for final inclusion. Results Our review of titles, abstracts, and full texts resulted in the inclusion of 116 relevant studies in our final analysis. Our review identified 14 general and 25 disease-specific QoLQ. The most-used general QoLQ were the Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) in 27 studies and EuroQol 5-Dimension, (EQ-5D) in 26 studies. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ), a cancer-specific QoLQ, was the most frequently used disease-specific QoLQ (28 studies). Disease-specific QoLQ were also identified for nutrition-related diseases such as diabetes, obesity, and dysphagia. Sixteen studies used multiple QoLQ, of which eight studies included both general and disease-specific measures of HRQoL. The most studied diseases were cancer (36 studies) and malnutrition (24 studies). There were few studies focused on specific age-group populations, with only 38 studies (33%) focused on adults 65 years and older and only 4 studies focused on pediatric patients. Regional variation in QoLQ use was observed, with EQ-5D used more frequently in Europe and SF-36 more commonly used in North America. Conclusions Use of QoLQ to measure HRQoL is well established in the literature; both general and disease-specific instruments are now available for use. We advise further studies to examine potential benefits of using both general and disease-specific QoLQ to better understand the impact of nutritional interventions on HRQoL.

show abstract