2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutritional programming effects on growth and reproduction of broodstock and embryonic development of progeny in yellow perch (Perca flavescens) fed soybean meal-based diets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it is feasible that while both broodstocks had the same nutritional history leading up to the study, the three weeks of SBM-diet prior to breeding may have had enough of an impact on the reproductive processes as well as gamete quality in the PPBS to affect the offspring. This is supported by a recent study finding that, regardless of nutritional history (SBM vs fishmeal), reproductive quality of broodstock is not affected as long as they are fed a fishmeal-based diet during gametogenesis [27]. This finding consequently suggests that NP of broodstock should be adjusted to the specific reproductive characteristics of fish species, including the time required for gonad maturation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, it is feasible that while both broodstocks had the same nutritional history leading up to the study, the three weeks of SBM-diet prior to breeding may have had enough of an impact on the reproductive processes as well as gamete quality in the PPBS to affect the offspring. This is supported by a recent study finding that, regardless of nutritional history (SBM vs fishmeal), reproductive quality of broodstock is not affected as long as they are fed a fishmeal-based diet during gametogenesis [27]. This finding consequently suggests that NP of broodstock should be adjusted to the specific reproductive characteristics of fish species, including the time required for gonad maturation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…While the significant programming effects reported in other studies [13, 17]were not observed in our growth performance study, it is important to note that weight gains among the FMBS were not significantly different. A similar programming study using yellow perch ( Perca flavescens ) also found no significance in growth rate between programmed and non-programmed fish [27]. In another study, NP with dietary carbohydrates from plant products initially improved growth performance in European sea bass ( Dicentrarchus labrax ) larvae; however, programming effects faded over time and no signifcant difference in growth was observed between programmed and nonprogrammed juveniles [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nutritional programming has been shown to improve growth performance in rainbow trout [1], yellow perch Perca flavescens [6], and gilthead seabream Sparus aurata [4, 5]. Perera and Yufera [7] induced NP during the first three days after mouth opening in zebrafish but did not observe any differences in the growth rate during later feeding with soybean meal-based diet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, these authors later showed that the same fish at 16-month of age were still able to grow on low FM/fish oil diets better compared to control group suggesting positive long-term effect of NP on utilization of vegetable-based diet [5]. Finally, NP with soybean meal-based diets has been recently shown to successfully adapt yellow perch Perca flavenscens to utilize the same soybean meal diet during adult stages, leading to better growth compared to yellow perch that were not exposed to soybean meal diet during the early developmental stage [6]. Most of the NP studies on fish focus, however, on NP with PP induced during fish juvenile stages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%