2010
DOI: 10.1017/s1751731109991601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutritional sub-fertility in the dairy cow: towards improved reproductive management through a better biological understanding

Abstract: There has been a significant decline in the reproductive performance of dairy cattle in recent decades. Cows, take longer time to return to the oestrus after calving, have poorer conception rates, and show fewer signs of oestrus. Achieving good reproductive performance is an increasing challenge for the dairy producer. In this study we focus on understanding the overall biological phenomena associated with nutritional sub-fertility rather than the underlying multiplicity of physiological interactions (already … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
42
1
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 152 publications
(139 reference statements)
3
42
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, numerous transfers of improved dairy cattle from temperate zones to harsh environments revealed that performance were considerably lower due to the recognized effects of genotype-environment interactions (Hammami et al, 2008). The approach to analysing the exact causes of difficulties encountered with highly selected ruminants, even in ICs, is now questioned (see Blanc et al, 2006;Friggens and Newbold, 2007;Friggens et al, 2010).…”
Section: Effects Of Feeding Practices In Producing Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, numerous transfers of improved dairy cattle from temperate zones to harsh environments revealed that performance were considerably lower due to the recognized effects of genotype-environment interactions (Hammami et al, 2008). The approach to analysing the exact causes of difficulties encountered with highly selected ruminants, even in ICs, is now questioned (see Blanc et al, 2006;Friggens and Newbold, 2007;Friggens et al, 2010).…”
Section: Effects Of Feeding Practices In Producing Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to reproduction, it has also been underlined (Blanc et al, 2006) that the introduction of a delay in the response is also a way of adapting to inadequate nutrition. This is particularly the case in species such as the bovines, whose reproduction should occur during lactation at a stage when the females are in strong negative energy balance (see Friggens et al, 2010).…”
Section: Effects Of Feeding Practices In Producing Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finding that selecting cows for a specific production trait, that is, creating specialist animals, decreases their robustness is supported by studies in other species (Reznick et al, 2000;Theilgaard et al, 2007) and also by simulation studies (van der Waaij, 2004). Thus, and contrary to some reports (Collier et al, 2005), continued selection for increased milk production is not without cost (see also Friggens et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The occurrence of GHP, that is, metritis, placental retention or vaginal infection, at or following calving was included in the model for its impact on the calving-to-first ovulation (CFO) interval. Although a decrease in BCS increases the risk of GHP (Friggens et al, 2010), we applied a unique and fixed probability of GHP occurrence to every cow, equal to 0.28 for each calving. This value was the observed frequency of GHP in the original database (n 5 98 lactations).…”
Section: Description Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both of these factors are known to affect reproduction (Roche et al, 2009;Friggens et al, 2010), a proportion of these effects being directly attributable to genetic selection (Boichard et al, 2002;Berry et al, 2003). More precisely, each step of the reproductive process appears to be affected either by MY level and dynamics or by the level of energy balance and body reserves or both (Friggens et al, 2010;Cutullic et al, 2011). Recently, these effects were quantified for each step of the reproductive process (Cutullic et al, 2012) but not for the overall process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%