2022
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.916073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutritional support during the hospital stay is cost-effective for preventing adverse outcomes in patients with cancer

Abstract: ObjectiveAmong patients with cancer, malnutrition remains common and is a key challenge in oncology practice today. A prior study from our group revealed that malnourished cancer inpatients who got nutritional treatment (intervention group) had lower mortality and improved functional and quality of life outcomes compared to inpatients without nutritional support (control group). Our present analysis aimed to determine whether the improved patient recovery by nutritional support was paralleled by cost-effective… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Altogether, the results of the PreMiO [ 6 ] and NUTRIONCO studies highlight the importance of a timely and careful evaluation of nutritional risk in cancer patients, in particular those with non-metastatic disease, through early screenings and continuous application of supportive treatments. Strategies to limit or prevent cancer cachexia and improve nutritional status include support for cancer patients at nutritional risk with oral nutritional supplements, specific nutrients, and enteral or parenteral nutrition [ 46 ], i.e., relatively low-cost interventions that have not only clinical, but also financial benefits, with proven cost-effectiveness [ 47 ]. Other early strategies are based on the clinical management of symptoms that impede proper food intake (e.g., pain, depression, nausea, vomiting).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Altogether, the results of the PreMiO [ 6 ] and NUTRIONCO studies highlight the importance of a timely and careful evaluation of nutritional risk in cancer patients, in particular those with non-metastatic disease, through early screenings and continuous application of supportive treatments. Strategies to limit or prevent cancer cachexia and improve nutritional status include support for cancer patients at nutritional risk with oral nutritional supplements, specific nutrients, and enteral or parenteral nutrition [ 46 ], i.e., relatively low-cost interventions that have not only clinical, but also financial benefits, with proven cost-effectiveness [ 47 ]. Other early strategies are based on the clinical management of symptoms that impede proper food intake (e.g., pain, depression, nausea, vomiting).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 26 To date, there is evidence that an individualised nutritional support reduces the risk of mortality and improves QoL in patients with cancer at malnutritional risk. 27 Moreover, nutritional support for oncology patients is a low-cost intervention compared with other cares 28 and it does not require additional costs for the healthcare system. 29 However, the impact on survival still requires confirmation as reliable real-world data are lacking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estudios que evalúan costos médicos asociados a enfermedades relacionadas con desnutrición estiman un gasto anual de $9.500 -$15.500 millones de dólares en EE.UU. y > €31 mil millones de euros en Europa (14,15).…”
Section: Costos De La Desnutriciónunclassified
“…Estudios apuntan que pacientes desnutridos tienen un tiempo promedio de internación hospitalaria mayor (3,4 días) que los pacientes bien nutridos, con un costo de internación hospitalaria aumentado. Por lo tanto, el soporte nutricional intrahospitalario para pacientes desnutridos o con riesgo nutricional es una intervención de bajo costo con beneficios clínicos y económicos (15,24).…”
Section: Desnutrición Relacionada Con Enfermedadunclassified