1986
DOI: 10.1136/gut.27.suppl_1.85
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutritional support: how much for how much?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Measurements of nutritional status suggest significant levels of undernutrition in the population interviewed (Fig. 5) In many of these patients this may reflect the severity of illness rather than inadequate nutritional intake; as noted by Koretz (1986), ‘a poorer nutritional state may be a consequence of a more severe underlying disease.’…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Measurements of nutritional status suggest significant levels of undernutrition in the population interviewed (Fig. 5) In many of these patients this may reflect the severity of illness rather than inadequate nutritional intake; as noted by Koretz (1986), ‘a poorer nutritional state may be a consequence of a more severe underlying disease.’…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“… PURPOSE : To review data about the relationship between pressure sores and (1) nutritional status, (2) nutrient intake, and (3) tube feeding. DATA SOURCES : Medline search of terms associated with “decubitus ulcer” combined with terms associated with “pressure sore” from 1985 through August 1994. Hand review of all issues of the journal Decubitus (now Advances in Wound Care ) through June 1994 and the Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition from January 1987 through May‐June 1994. Review of bibliography of pertinent articles.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PURPOSE : To review data about the relationship between pressure sores and (1) nutritional status, (2) nutrient intake, and (3) tube feeding.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, large reviews of nutritional support studies (e.g. Koretz, 1986) have found that few controlled studies have proven its clinical efficacy, not least because patient numbers were small; the groups were heterogenous for disease type and severity and nutritional status; and inappropriate or inadequate nutritional support was given for an inadequate length of time in order to have a clinical impact. The Veterans Affairs Study Group (1991) found that only in patients with severe malnutrition did preoperative parenteral feeding lead to a reduction in non-infectious complications without a concomitant increase in infectious complications compared to controls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%