2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutritional value and potential chemical food safety hazards of selected Polish sausages as influenced by their traditionality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The exception is, however, sausage K, which has positive values of both components and differs much from other traditional meat products tested. Therefore, on the basis of PCA, it can be stated that Polish traditional smoked hams and sausages are generally characterized by relatively higher shares of C 18:0, C 18:1 (cis-9), C 20:3 (cis- 11,14,17) and lower of C 13:0, C 17:1 (cis-10), C 18:2 (cis-9,12), C 20:0, C 12:0, C 16:1 (cis-9), C 18:1 (trans-9) than conventional meat products.…”
Section: The Verification Of the Differences Between Traditional And mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The exception is, however, sausage K, which has positive values of both components and differs much from other traditional meat products tested. Therefore, on the basis of PCA, it can be stated that Polish traditional smoked hams and sausages are generally characterized by relatively higher shares of C 18:0, C 18:1 (cis-9), C 20:3 (cis- 11,14,17) and lower of C 13:0, C 17:1 (cis-10), C 18:2 (cis-9,12), C 20:0, C 12:0, C 16:1 (cis-9), C 18:1 (trans-9) than conventional meat products.…”
Section: The Verification Of the Differences Between Traditional And mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These products have lower prices but are produced by means of the technology that involves the use of various food additives which substitute high-priced raw materials [11]. As a consequence, such meat products notably differ in the sensory characteristics and partly in nutritional value [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the average protein content in Silesian, Krakow and frankfurter sausages determined by the cited authors was at the level of 11.29-19.51%, water at the level of 52.40-65.95% and fat at 15.61-3.70%. In studies conducted by Halagard et al [42] on selected sausages from traditional and conventional productions, it was shown that the average water content ranged from 44.73 g/100 g to 60.14 g/100 g, proteins between 11.35 g/100 g and 24.3 g/100 g and fat from 21.80 g/100 g to 26.39 g/100 g. Grabowska et al [43] in their research, on the other hand, obtained a higher average protein content in traditional smoked products (21.26%) and in local products (20.06%) compared to the amounts of these ingredients determined in sausages in the author's research ( Table 2). In turn, Halagarda et al [44], analysing hams from traditional and conventional productions, showed that traditional hams are characterised by the highest nutritional value among the analysed product groups.…”
Section: Variant Of Smokingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Van Boxstael et al ( 2013 ) studied the impacts of bacterial pathogens and viruses on food safety in the fresh produce chain. Also, a lot of studies are focusing on food safety and chemistry, such as untargeted food chemical safety assessment (Delaporte et al 2019 ), chemical safety of recycled food packaging (Geueke et al 2018 ), and chemical food safety hazards of sausages (Halagarda et al 2018 ). Furthermore, studies on food safety and agriculture include but are not limited to chemical and biological risks in urban agriculture (Buscaroli et al 2021 ), biosensors for sustainable agriculture and food safety (Griesche and Baeumner 2020 ), agricultural soil contamination, and the impact on food safety (Wang et al 2019b ).…”
Section: A Scientometric Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%