2023
DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.16496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nylon microfibers develop a distinct plastisphere but have no apparent effects on the gut microbiome or gut tissue status in the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis

Hannah I. Collins,
Tyler W. Griffin,
Bridget A. Holohan
et al.

Abstract: Ingestion of microplastics (MP) by suspension‐feeding bivalves has been well‐documented. However, it is unclear whether exposure to MP could damage the stomach and digestive gland (gut) of these animals, causing ramifications for organism and ecosystem health. Here, we show no apparent effects of nylon microfiber (MF) ingestion on the gut microbiome or digestive tissues of the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis. We exposed mussels to two low concentrations (50 and 100 particles/L) of either nylon MF or Spartina spp. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 76 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Caution should be exercised in a multi-study analysis to avoid spurious comparisons between samples that were demonstrably altered by the treatments imposed by the original experiments. It is notable that for the 167 samples in the present study, all 'treatment' groups of mussels from Griffin, Pierce, et al (2021), Collins (2022), Collins et al (2023) and Griffin et al (previously unpublished b) did not show significant differences from the control groups, with one key exception. The samples collected from six mussels that were exposed to antibiotics possessed a microbial community that was significantly perturbed compared to the control state (Griffin, Pierce, et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 40%
“…Caution should be exercised in a multi-study analysis to avoid spurious comparisons between samples that were demonstrably altered by the treatments imposed by the original experiments. It is notable that for the 167 samples in the present study, all 'treatment' groups of mussels from Griffin, Pierce, et al (2021), Collins (2022), Collins et al (2023) and Griffin et al (previously unpublished b) did not show significant differences from the control groups, with one key exception. The samples collected from six mussels that were exposed to antibiotics possessed a microbial community that was significantly perturbed compared to the control state (Griffin, Pierce, et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 40%