2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.168880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

O-doping induced abundant active-sites in MoS2 nanosheets for propelling polysulfide conversion of Li-S batteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen, all XRD patterns are very similar, indicating that the solvothermal temperature has little effect on the phase composition of the samples. Impressively, the diffraction peaks of the as-prepared VS 2 @C are distinctly different from those of 2H-VS 2 (JCPDS 89–1640). , Two obviously formed sharp peaks at 2θ = 9.0° and 17.9° corresponding to the interlayer spacing of 0.98 and 0.50 nm can be observed, which can be indexed to the expanded (001) and (002) planes of VS 2 , respectively. , Notably, three diffraction peaks at 35.7°, 45.2°, and 57.1° can be well assigned to (011), (012), and (110) planes of 2H-VS 2 , suggesting that for the three samples the atomic arrangement along above basal planes are the same as 2H-VS 2 . Moreover, it has been reported that the carbonization of carbon source (such as AA and glucose) results in the formation of amorphous carbon layers in the solvothermal process, which can be in situ coated on the surface of the VS 2 nanosheets to enhance the interaction between VS 2 and carbon. However, the characteristic peaks of carbon are not obvious in the XRD patterns, which probably is amorphous and deserves further discussion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As can be seen, all XRD patterns are very similar, indicating that the solvothermal temperature has little effect on the phase composition of the samples. Impressively, the diffraction peaks of the as-prepared VS 2 @C are distinctly different from those of 2H-VS 2 (JCPDS 89–1640). , Two obviously formed sharp peaks at 2θ = 9.0° and 17.9° corresponding to the interlayer spacing of 0.98 and 0.50 nm can be observed, which can be indexed to the expanded (001) and (002) planes of VS 2 , respectively. , Notably, three diffraction peaks at 35.7°, 45.2°, and 57.1° can be well assigned to (011), (012), and (110) planes of 2H-VS 2 , suggesting that for the three samples the atomic arrangement along above basal planes are the same as 2H-VS 2 . Moreover, it has been reported that the carbonization of carbon source (such as AA and glucose) results in the formation of amorphous carbon layers in the solvothermal process, which can be in situ coated on the surface of the VS 2 nanosheets to enhance the interaction between VS 2 and carbon. However, the characteristic peaks of carbon are not obvious in the XRD patterns, which probably is amorphous and deserves further discussion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,32 Notably, three diffraction peaks at 35.7°, 45.2°, and 57.1°can be well assigned to (011), (012), and (110) planes of 2H-VS 2 , suggesting that for the three samples the atomic arrangement along above basal planes are the same as 2H-VS 2 . 30 Moreover, it has been reported that the carbonization of carbon source (such as AA and glucose) results in the formation of amorphous carbon layers in the solvothermal process, which can be in situ coated on the surface of the VS 2 nanosheets to enhance the interaction between VS 2 and carbon. 44−47 However, the characteristic peaks of carbon are not obvious in the XRD patterns, which probably is amorphous and deserves further discussion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on this, a series of tactics, such as phase conversion engineering, amorphization, defect and heterointerface engineering, were attempted to build extra active sites to increase the electrocatalytic activity of MoS 2 . [26][27][28][29][30][31][32] Under the signicant enlightenment of the "Co-Mo-S" active phase theory, Co serving as a metal promoter can partially substitute for Mo atoms at the border of MoS 2 to weaken the intensity of surrounding Mo-S bonds, assisting electrocatalytic reactions. 33 Lin et al synthesized a Co-MoS 2 /G composite and investigated the dominant role of Co sites in sulfur conversion reactions, in which the implantation of Co atoms induces a phase transformation from 2H to 1T and simultaneously generates abundant basal-plane S vacancies, promoting the redox conversion kinetics of sulfur species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%