1987
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.35.2407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

O(N)-symmetric λφ4theory: The Gaussian-effective-potential approach

Abstract: The O(N)-symmetric generalization of h94 theory is studied in the Gaussian-effective-potential (GEP) approach. It is shown that the GEP encompasses and transcends the leading-order 1 / N expansion results. We find two distinct, nontrivial versions of the (3 + 1)-dimensional theory: (i) "precarious 94 theory," with negative, infinitesimal AB, which coincides with the 1 / N result; and (ii) "autonomous b4 theory," with positive, infinitesimal hB and an infinite wave-function renormalization, which is inaccessibl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
81
0

Year Published

1989
1989
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous Hamiltonian based work on the O(2)-model a finite Goldstone boson mass m(2) ≃ m(1)/2.06 [9] is obtained, in contradiction to Goldstone's theorem. We will show that a symmetric Gaussian ansatz and a further rediagonalization of the effective Hamiltonian exactly gives a zero mass Goldstone excitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In previous Hamiltonian based work on the O(2)-model a finite Goldstone boson mass m(2) ≃ m(1)/2.06 [9] is obtained, in contradiction to Goldstone's theorem. We will show that a symmetric Gaussian ansatz and a further rediagonalization of the effective Hamiltonian exactly gives a zero mass Goldstone excitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Although spontaneous symmetry breaking for the O(N)-model has been discussed before in the framework of the Gaussian Effective Potential [9], only massive excitations were found. This violation of Goldstone's theorem was ascribed to symmetry breaking "at the operator level", i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations