2016
DOI: 10.11606/1413-8050/ea153891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

O programa bolsa família e o mercado de trabalho informal: uma análise de impacto da ação Brasil carinhoso

Abstract: O presente artigo objetiva verificar a existência de impactos da ação Brasil Carinhoso em uma eventual escolha pela informalidade por parte dos seus beneficiários. Parte-se de grupos de controle e tratamento, criados a partir das PNADs 2011 e 2012, compostos por indivíduos ocupados elegíveis ou potencialmente elegíveis ao benefício. O principal resultado encontrado aponta para uma relação significativa e negativa entre o recebimento do benefício Brasil Carinhoso e a escolha pela informalidade. Entre as possíve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[20][21][22][23][24][25] BFP can also affect the socioeconomic conditions of the household, including more working hours, better jobs and higher income. [26][27][28] Effects of CCTs that may be observed at in the medium term include those intermediated by the health conditionalities of BFP, such as increased healthcare utilisation. [29][30][31] Possible long-term impacts include those stimulated by reductions in early life and cumulative socioeconomic adversity, 32 33 improved access to education and upward social mobility.…”
Section: Logic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20][21][22][23][24][25] BFP can also affect the socioeconomic conditions of the household, including more working hours, better jobs and higher income. [26][27][28] Effects of CCTs that may be observed at in the medium term include those intermediated by the health conditionalities of BFP, such as increased healthcare utilisation. [29][30][31] Possible long-term impacts include those stimulated by reductions in early life and cumulative socioeconomic adversity, 32 33 improved access to education and upward social mobility.…”
Section: Logic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%