2000
DOI: 10.1126/science.289.5481.938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

O 2 Activation by Nonheme Iron Complexes: A Monomeric Fe(III)-Oxo Complex Derived From O 2

Abstract: Iron species with terminal oxo ligands are implicated as key intermediates in several synthetic and biochemical catalytic cycles. However, there is a dearth of structural information regarding these types of complexes because their instability has precluded isolation under ambient conditions. The isolation and structural characterization of an iron(III) complex with a terminal oxo ligand, derived directly from dioxygen (O2), is reported. A stable structure resulted from placing the oxoiron unit within a synthe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
315
1
11

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 438 publications
(345 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
18
315
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…3). This mode is consistent with the calculated ν Fe─O of tripodal Fe III ─O − (19) but is lower than the ν Fe─O (671 cm −1 ) of the only reported nonheme Fe III ─O − model complex (20). This frequency is at the high end of calculated ν Fe─OH values (19) and distinct from those of most experimentally measured hydroxyl modes, but it is very close to the ν FeðIVÞ─OH mode of protonated compound II of chloroperoxidase (CPO) at 565 cm −1 (21) and the ν FeðIIIÞ─OH modes of di-iron hydroxomethemerythrin at 565 cm −1 (22) and a synthetic Fe III ─OH model at 574 cm −1 (23).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…3). This mode is consistent with the calculated ν Fe─O of tripodal Fe III ─O − (19) but is lower than the ν Fe─O (671 cm −1 ) of the only reported nonheme Fe III ─O − model complex (20). This frequency is at the high end of calculated ν Fe─OH values (19) and distinct from those of most experimentally measured hydroxyl modes, but it is very close to the ν FeðIVÞ─OH mode of protonated compound II of chloroperoxidase (CPO) at 565 cm −1 (21) and the ν FeðIIIÞ─OH modes of di-iron hydroxomethemerythrin at 565 cm −1 (22) and a synthetic Fe III ─OH model at 574 cm −1 (23).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…46 Their relative bond strengths are also reflected in their Fe-X bond energies (calculated from fragment dissociation in CH 2 -Cl 2 solvent), which show that the Fe III -O bond energy is about -102 kcal/mol, significantly higher than the Fe III -S bonding energy of -62 kcal/ mol. 47 Note that, although the coefficients (46) Note that the force constant for Fe-O is expected to be higher than that of Fe-S by a factor of 1.44 due to higher mass of S (32) relative to O (16). However, here the ratio is 1.9 which indicates that the Fe-O bond is stronger than the Fe-S bond.…”
Section: A Evaluation Of Dft Calculations Using Xasmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This link has recently been identified independently by the groups of Li et al 56 and Cho et al, who generated a high-spin Fe III -OOH complex supported by the Me 4 cy ligand via protonation of the side-on peroxoiron(III) conjugate base 56,57 . This hydroperoxo complex was shown to convert quantitatively to the corresponding S = 1 oxoiron(IV) complex either through acid-mediated O-O bond heterolysis, followed by the reduction of the transient oxoiron(V) intermediate 56 46, also reacts with O 2 to yield an oxoiron(III) intermediate, which is proposed to derive from the reduction of an initially formed oxoiron(IV) species. Although the oxoiron(IV) species on the way to the generation of the oxoiron(III) complex could not be trapped, it has recently been synthesized by the one-electron oxidation of the preformed [(H 3 buea)Fe III (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%