2013
DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2013-051184.0166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

O14.6 Aetiology of Infectious Proctitis Differs by HIV Status

Abstract: Methods We undertook a study of MSM who presented to Melbourne Sexual Health Centre with symptomatic proctitis between March 2003 and December 2011. Men with proctitis were tested for gonorrhoea by culture, chlamydia by strand displacement assay, and herpes simplex virus (HSV) by PCR. Chlamydia positive specimens were genotyped for lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV). Results Among the 279 men in the study, 141 were HIV positive and 138 were HIV negative. The median CD4 count among HIV positive men was 423 (range 1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CT was more common than GC as a cause of proctitis, but both were common in both HIV-positive and HIV-negative men. 17 HSV (36% versus 19%) and LGV (7.8% versus 0.7%) were significantly more common in HIV positive men than HIV negative men. 17…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CT was more common than GC as a cause of proctitis, but both were common in both HIV-positive and HIV-negative men. 17 HSV (36% versus 19%) and LGV (7.8% versus 0.7%) were significantly more common in HIV positive men than HIV negative men. 17…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…16 At the University of Melbourne, Bissessor et al. 17 (O14.6) investigated the causes of infectious proctitis in HIV-positive and HIV-negative men. CT was more common than GC as a cause of proctitis, but both were common in both HIV-positive and HIV-negative men.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%