O992 Fetomaternal outcome of pregnancy with cardiac disease

Wasim, Tayyiba; Amer, Wagdy M

doi:10.1016/s0020-7292(09)61365-5

Cited by 14 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Rheumatic heart disease was the most common cause of cardiac disease and mitral stenosis was the most common cardiac lesion noted in our study, which was comparable to other studies. 2,3,[6][7][8][9][10] With the advent of more modern techniques and advancement in knowledge, the circulation and hemodynamic during pregnancy has been well understood and managed. 11 Use of echocardiogram provides aetiology of the type of lesion and non-invasion method of ascertaining the severity of the lesion.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Cardiac disease complicates about 1% of pregnancies in women. [1][2][3][4] The most important causes of heart disease are rheumatic heart disease and congenital abnormalities. The proportion of women of child-bearing age with congenital heart defects, surgically treated or otherwise has increased substantially in recent decades due to improved surgical and cardiac care.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Clinical study of cardiac diseases during pregnancy

Kamat

Dama

2016

Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical study of cardiac diseases during pregnancy

Kamat

Dama

2016

Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Similar observations were seen in studies done by various authors. [9][10][11][12] In our study, most of the women went into spontaneous labour (50%) and majority was delivered vaginally (71.6%). The cesarean section (28.4%) was performed for various obstetric indications.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 77%

Maternal and fetal outcome in cardiac disease complicating pregnancy at a tertiary centre in a rural area

Ashwini¹,

J²

2014

Int Jour of Biomed Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The most common types of study design were cohort (19) and case series (20), with two qualitative studies, one cross‐sectional and one longitudinal screening study . There was considerable heterogeneity in the methodologies, levels of evidence, and reporting measures of these predominantly retrospective studies.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Standardizing clinical care measures of rheumatic heart disease in pregnancy: A qualitative synthesis

Vaughan

Dawson

Peek

et al. 2019

Birth

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is a preventable cardiac condition that escalates risk in pregnancy. Models of care informed by evidence‐based clinical guidelines are essential to optimal health outcomes. There are no published reviews that systematically explore approaches to care provision for pregnant women with RHD and examine reported measures. The review objective was to improve understanding of how attributes of care for these women are reported and how they align with guidelines. Methods A search of 13 databases was supported by hand‐searching. Papers that met inclusion criteria were appraised using CASP/JBI checklists. A content analysis of extracted data from the findings sections of included papers was undertaken, informed by attributes of quality care identified previously from existing guidelines. Results The 43 included studies were predominantly conducted in tertiary care centers of low‐income and middle‐income countries. Cardiac guidelines were referred to in 25 of 43 studies. Poorer outcomes were associated with higher risk scores (detailed in 36 of 41 quantitative studies). Indicators associated with increased risk include anticoagulation during pregnancy (28 of 41 reported) and late booking (gestation documented in 15 of 41 studies). Limited access to cardiac interventions was discussed (19 of 43) in the context of poorer outcomes. Conversely, early assessment and access to regular multidisciplinary care were emphasized in promoting optimal outcomes for women and their babies. Conclusions Despite often complex care requirements in challenging environments, pregnancy provides an opportunity to strengthen health system responses and address whole‐of‐life health for women with RHD. A standard set of core indicators is proposed to more accurately benchmark care pathways, outcomes, and burden.

show abstract

O992 Fetomaternal outcome of pregnancy with cardiac disease

Cited by 14 publications

References 0 publications

Clinical study of cardiac diseases during pregnancy

Clinical study of cardiac diseases during pregnancy

Maternal and fetal outcome in cardiac disease complicating pregnancy at a tertiary centre in a rural area

Standardizing clinical care measures of rheumatic heart disease in pregnancy: A qualitative synthesis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About