INTRODUCTIONPolycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common disease that affects up to 10% of women of reproductive age, in which hyperandrogenism (HA), enlarged cystic ovaries, and chronic anovulation often coexist with obesity, dyslipidemia and insulin resistance (IR).1 The etiology of the syndrome has remained unknown although it has been revealed that IR lies at the core of its pathophysiology. 2,3 Obesity in women with PCOS is rather high, ranging from 30% to 60%, whereas hyperinsulinemia is present in more than 50% of patients with PCOS. 4,5 Furthermore, although about 70% of obese women with PCOS exhibit an exaggerated insulin secretion, this feature is also present in 20%-40% of lean PCOS. [6][7][8] Chronic hyperinsulinemia results in different pathologies such as diabetes mellitus type 2, hypertension, cardiovascular diseases and metabolic syndrome.1,9 Risk factors of cardiovascular diseases tend to accumulate in these women even at their young age and dyslipidemia in these patients is correlated with IR. [10][11][12] It has been proven ABSTRACT Background: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common disease that affects up to 10% of women of reproductive age, in which hyperandrogenism (HA), enlarged cystic ovaries, and chronic anovulation often co-exist with obesity, dyslipidemia and insulin resistance (IR). There is a need for an alternative to metformin with minimal side effects to improve insulin sensitivity and correct dyslipidemia in PCOS patients. Methods: It was a prospective, Randomized controlled clinical trial. 116 PCOS patients, 58 each in two groups received either Metformin 500 mg TDS or N-acetylcysteine (NAC) 600 mg TDS for 3 months. Clinical and biochemical parameters contributing to metabolic syndrome (MS) and insulin resistance (fasting blood sugar (FBS), fasting insulin (FI), FBS:FI, HOMA-IR and QUICKI) were assessed at the start and end of the study. Results were compared between the two groups. Results: Both treatment modalities resulted in a significant reduction in number of cases with IR (p=0.001) and MS. Fasting hyperinsulinemia improved in 15 % (p=0.12) and 30% (p=0.001) of patients while 12% (p=0.23) and 18% (p=0.049) improvement was seen in FBS:FI in MET and NAC group respectively. Similarly, improvement in HOMA-IR was 12% (p=0.30) and 32% (p=0.001) in MET and NAC group which is significant with NAC. QUICKI and impaired glucose tolerance showed significant improvement in both the groups with a p-value of 0.04 and 0.006, 0.035 and 0.046 respectively. Significant reduction was seen in triglycerides (p=0.048) in NAC group. Conclusions: NAC is equally efficacious as metformin in improving parameters of insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome with minimal occasional side effects ensuring better compliance for a long-term therapy.