2021
DOI: 10.1155/2021/9967357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Obesity as a Risk Factor for Failure to Wean from ECMO: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract: Purpose. Obesity has been associated with an increased risk of respiratory complications and other systemic illnesses. Respiratory dynamics in an obese patient, combined with modified lung physiology of ARDS, present a significant challenge in managing obese patients with ARDS. Many physicians think of obesity as a relative contraindication to ECMO. We performed a meta-analysis to see the effect of obesity on weaning from ECMO and survival to hospital discharge. Methods. We searched online databases for studie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this did include patients on VA support. 26 Additionally, a more recent 2022 ELSO study of more than 18,000 respiratory failure patients on ECMO (performed after our review was complete) shows that patients with BMIs of greater than or equal to 35 had decreased inpatient mortality and reduced hospital length of stays. 27 Based on our review, there does appear to be at least a trend toward reduced mortality among obese VV ECMO adults, but there is not a clear explanation.…”
Section: Mortalitymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, this did include patients on VA support. 26 Additionally, a more recent 2022 ELSO study of more than 18,000 respiratory failure patients on ECMO (performed after our review was complete) shows that patients with BMIs of greater than or equal to 35 had decreased inpatient mortality and reduced hospital length of stays. 27 Based on our review, there does appear to be at least a trend toward reduced mortality among obese VV ECMO adults, but there is not a clear explanation.…”
Section: Mortalitymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Small case series found no survival difference with BMI dichotomized at 30 kg/m 2 [ 19 ], 35 kg/m 2 [ 20 ], or 40 kg/m 2 [ 11 ], as a continuous variable [ 8 , 9 , 35 ] or stratified by subcategories [ 9 , 10 , 12 ], although a trend toward improved survival was suggested for the highest BMI values [ 11 , 12 ]. A systematic review and meta-analysis of mixed cardiac and respiratory ECMO patients found no association of BMI ≥ 30 kg/m 2 with mortality [ 36 ]. Others observed lower mortality for patients with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m 2 [ 13 ] or BMI ≥ 40 kg/m 2 [ 14 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this cohort of COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 VV ECMO patients at a high-volume ECMO referral center, BMI ≥ 40 was not associated with worse in-hospital mortality. Prior to the pandemic, regardless of VV ECMO indication, obesity was not considered a contraindication to VV ECMO, 12 , 21 and even patients with a BMI greater than 50 demonstrated similar outcomes compared to non-obese VV ECMO patients. 14 Whereas obesity can pose challenges for the ECMO management team, including cannulation, prone positioning, and ventilator management, these challenges have not translated to poor outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%