Various cut-off points for body mass index have been proposed to assess nutritional status in adolescents. The aim of this study was to compare two methods for evaluating overweight and obesity. In 2004-5, 4,452
IntroductionThe prevalence of overweight and obesity has increased alarmingly in recent years, both in developed countries and those with medium or low income. The relationship between obesity and the morbidity and mortality profile has been well established in adults. In adolescents, recent studies have shown an association between obesity and increased risk of diseases 1 . Obese adolescents are subject to discrimination and have fewer opportunities for work and social integration 2 .Anthropometry has been the main tool for evaluating nutritional status, principally in population studies, due to its low cost and ease of use. According to World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines 3 , diagnosis of overweight and obesity should be done through percentiles in the body mass index (BMI) by age and gender, using the data compiled by Must et al. 4 . BMI values above the 85 th percentile indicate risk of overweight, as well as obesity when triceps and subscapular skinfolds greater than or equal to the 90 th percentile are also present 3 . The difficulty in obtaining skinfold measurements has limited the use of this criterion for classifying obesity in this age group.An alternative method has been used frequently. The International Obesity Task Force (IOTF) recommends the use of the criterion proposed by Cole et al. 5 , in which individuals 2 to 18 years of age with BMI (by gender and age bracket) ARTIGO ARTICLE