2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13640-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Obesity in general elective surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

19
350
6
15

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 585 publications
(390 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
19
350
6
15
Order By: Relevance
“…One possible explanation is the greater amount of adipose tissue encountered at the hip during THA than at the knee during TKA. In this regard, it is known poor vascularity of adipose tissue has been linked with infection after abdominal surgery in obese patients [5,10,24]. We could find no other study reporting on deep prosthetic infection with a comparable number of morbidly obese patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…One possible explanation is the greater amount of adipose tissue encountered at the hip during THA than at the knee during TKA. In this regard, it is known poor vascularity of adipose tissue has been linked with infection after abdominal surgery in obese patients [5,10,24]. We could find no other study reporting on deep prosthetic infection with a comparable number of morbidly obese patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…SSI is the most common complication after colectomy, and obesity or overweight is thought to increase this risk by 2.5-to 5-fold as compared with patients of normal weight [13][14][15][16]. This risk may be related to the decreased oxygen tension in relatively avascular adipose tissue, differences in wound healing, greater wound size, or technical difficulties [13,17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We should look to other specialties, such as general surgery, where obesity has not been shown to influence outcomes, 23,40 as well as emerging data from Europe, which suggests that post-RP oncological outcomes are equivalent across BMI groups. 16,17,25 For prostate cancer patients, it is certainly worthwhile to discuss the potential for increased risk, but to emphasize that recent data does not support a significant difference regarding complications and BCR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%