2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.10.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Obesity-Promoting Food Environments and the Spatial Clustering of Food Outlets Around Schools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
162
2
8

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(182 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
10
162
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, two researchers undertook an audit of all food outlets located within 400 m and 800 m Euclidean buffer zones (41) around each school, using the Food Outlet Classification Tool described by Lake et al (42) . An 800 m buffer size was chosen as it is commonly used in local authority planning and is a common measure of the region of influence in research about food access around schools (17,(43)(44)(45)(46) .…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, two researchers undertook an audit of all food outlets located within 400 m and 800 m Euclidean buffer zones (41) around each school, using the Food Outlet Classification Tool described by Lake et al (42) . An 800 m buffer size was chosen as it is commonly used in local authority planning and is a common measure of the region of influence in research about food access around schools (17,(43)(44)(45)(46) .…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Chicago-based study found that there were far greater numbers of fast-food outlets located within a 1?5 km radius of schools compared with the numbers that might be expected by chance (29) . Moreover, the densities of fastfood and convenience stores around schools have been found to vary according to neighbourhood income and ethnic composition (25)(26)(27)(28)30) . For example, a study of five large urban areas across New Zealand found a significant clustering of fast-food and convenience stores near more deprived schools and schools in areas of high population density and commercial land use (30) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus on concentrations or clustering of FFOS while important (Austin, Melley et al, 2005;Day and Pearce, 2011) may be missing the wider issue of how people and in this instance pupils access the food and the influence of the 'school foodshed' which is wider ranging than concentrations of outlets. For example the concentration near schools may be important but the routes which children take to school may be as important, as FFOS near the school, in terms of the food choices students make.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%