2017
DOI: 10.1080/10106049.2017.1333531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Object- and pixel-based classifications of macroalgae farming area with high spatial resolution imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies show that object-based classification works better than pixel-based classification in high spatial resolution imagery (Dorren et al 2003;Myint et al 2011;Chen et al 2012;Jebur et al 2013). We have compared these two methods in Porphyra farms identification in Dayu Bay, showing that object-based classification received approximately 10% higher accuracy than pixel-based classification (Zheng et al 2017). Hence, we established our CTs based on the segmented objects rather than pixels of all layers and PCs.…”
Section: Traditional Ctmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Previous studies show that object-based classification works better than pixel-based classification in high spatial resolution imagery (Dorren et al 2003;Myint et al 2011;Chen et al 2012;Jebur et al 2013). We have compared these two methods in Porphyra farms identification in Dayu Bay, showing that object-based classification received approximately 10% higher accuracy than pixel-based classification (Zheng et al 2017). Hence, we established our CTs based on the segmented objects rather than pixels of all layers and PCs.…”
Section: Traditional Ctmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In facing of various spatial and temporal scales in a complex marine environment, remote sensing technology has substantially improved our ability to observe remote and vast areas at a fraction of the cost of traditional surveys [9]. To extract the marine aquaculture areas from remotely sensed images, previous studies have tried various methods including visual interpretation, spatial structure enhanced analyses [10,11], object-based image analysis (OBIA) [12][13][14], and deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) [15]. Visual interpretation is used less because it is labor-intensive and time-consuming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enhanced analyses that incorporate features such as texture or average filtering (Fan et al, 2015;Lu et al, 2015;Xiao et al, 2013) are commonly employed for pixelbased approaches. However, these are subject to noise (the salt-and-pepper effect) and decreased accuracy (Zheng et al, 2017). OBIA has been widely used for the detailed interpretation of marine aquaculture from remote sensing images (Fu et al, 2019a;Wang et al, 2017;Zheng et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%