2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2008.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Object-based land cover classification using airborne LiDAR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
184
1
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 306 publications
(191 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
184
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For the "Evergreen coniferous stand" class, the producer and user's accuracy levels were respectively 94 and 77%. The accuracy levels of these classifications are within the same range as those found by Antonarakis et al (2008), who compared five riparian forest stand types in Southern France.…”
Section: Validation Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…For the "Evergreen coniferous stand" class, the producer and user's accuracy levels were respectively 94 and 77%. The accuracy levels of these classifications are within the same range as those found by Antonarakis et al (2008), who compared five riparian forest stand types in Southern France.…”
Section: Validation Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…We used an object-based approach to classify land cover using the LiDAR point cloud, the Digital Elevation Models (DSM and DTM) and the 2D-model of buildings [13]. Using the height (DSM minus DTM) and LiDAR intensity (the ratio of the strength of the light reflected from an object related to the light emitted [6]), five classes were obtained using the following criteria: i) Water (water) with height = 0 and intensity = 0; ii) Permeable soil (soil per) with height < 1.5m and intensity > 30; iii) Forest (forest) with height > 1m , not matching the 2D built zone; iv) Impermeable soil (soil imp) with height < 1.5m and intensity < 30; v) Buildings (building) with height > 1m matching the 2D built zone.…”
Section: B Classification Based On Lidar and Demmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the main advantages of OBIA over per-pixel approaches is that using objects negates the impact of intra-class heterogeneity observed at the pixel-level, therefore eliminating the "salt-and-pepper" artefact [27]. Consequently, OBIA has been used extensively for a variety of applications, including forestry [28], habitat mapping [29], land use/land cover mapping [30], landform mapping [31,32] and change detection [33], with numerous studies reporting that higher classification accuracies can be achieved through the OBIA approach in comparison to pixel-based approaches [34][35][36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%