2014
DOI: 10.1111/cgf.12286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Object detection and classification from large‐scale cluttered indoor scans

Abstract: We present a method to automatically segment indoor scenes by detecting repeated objects. Our algorithm scales to datasets with 198 million points and does not require any training data. We propose a trivially parallelizable preprocessing step, which compresses a point cloud into a collection of nearly-planar patches related by geometric transformations. This representation enables us to robustly filter out noise and greatly reduces the computational cost and memory requirements of our method, enabling executi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
87
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, object-level structure analysis is investigated to match the captured objects to the high-quality 3D models in databases for improved reconstruction quality [Nan et al 2012;Shao et al 2012;Salas-Moreno et al 2013], while object repetition is explored to speed up large scale indoor scene reconstruction [Kim et al 2012;Mattausch et al 2014]. In contrast, our approach does not rely on a 3D model database, but performs online repeated object analysis to simultaneously reduce the scanning burden by providing real-time guidance to the user and improve the reconstruction quality through local volume fusion.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, object-level structure analysis is investigated to match the captured objects to the high-quality 3D models in databases for improved reconstruction quality [Nan et al 2012;Shao et al 2012;Salas-Moreno et al 2013], while object repetition is explored to speed up large scale indoor scene reconstruction [Kim et al 2012;Mattausch et al 2014]. In contrast, our approach does not rely on a 3D model database, but performs online repeated object analysis to simultaneously reduce the scanning burden by providing real-time guidance to the user and improve the reconstruction quality through local volume fusion.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, in recent years, significant efforts have gone towards capturing and parsing 3D scenes. Approaches include using classifiers on scene objects [Schlecht and Barnard 2009;Xiong and Huber 2010;Anand et al 2013;Koppula et al 2011;Silberman et al 2012], interactive 3D modeling from raw RGBD scans [Shao et al 2012], interleaving segmentation and classification [Nan et al 2012], unsupervised algorithms to identify and consolidate scans [Kim et al 2012;Mattausch et al 2014], dynamic reconstruction [Mitra et al 2007], proxy geometry based scene understanding [Lafarge and Alliez 2013;Monszpart et al 2015], or studying the spatial layout of scenes Lee et al 2010;Hartley et al 2012].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although certain popular public localization datasets (Dubrovnik [13], Rome [13], Vienna [11] and Aachen [18]) use 2D images as a query, these do not fit our need for capturing a short video as a query. Mattausch et al [17] scanned rooms using microCT to build 3D room models. As there are no features associated with each point, this dataset is not suitable for testing our method.…”
Section: Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%