2022 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/ijcnn55064.2022.9892618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Object Detection with Spiking Neural Networks on Automotive Event Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So far, SNNs have been used for classification tasks like image recognition [13], [29], object detection [30], [31], or motion segmentation [32]. Only a few works employed them for regression tasks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, SNNs have been used for classification tasks like image recognition [13], [29], object detection [30], [31], or motion segmentation [32]. Only a few works employed them for regression tasks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mapping the event stream to a dense representation [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29] is an important approach. Even if these methods lose some of the event's temporal resolution, they gain in terms of accuracy and scalability.…”
Section: A Feature Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A histogram method called ''event cube'' [24] has been proposed to combine the simplicity of histograms with the temporal information of time surfaces. Voxel grids [25], [26], voxel cube [27], graph [28], and DART (distribution aware retinal transform) [29] are successful examples of dense descriptors, statistical or structural, for event-based data. They preserve partially temporal information and asynchronous characteristics.…”
Section: A Feature Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evaluation of state-of-the-art neuromorphic vision algorithms: We evaluate 13 existing neuromorphic vision algorithms (3 SNNs and 10 DNNs) on our dataset and report on their performance along with insights about the comparative performance. In particular, Experimental evaluation of the dataset proposed in this work has been performed by training Visual Geometry Group (VGG) [52], DenseNet [27], and MobileNet [26] SNNs which have been previously benchmarked in the literature on a large collection of neuromorphic data [12]. The results of the evaluation are competitive to the benchmarking results for each trained SNN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%