Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 1999 1999
DOI: 10.4133/1.2922673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Object Identification Using Multifrequency EMI Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the previously derived processor [as in (10)], which assumed a "fixed" target/sensor orientation, is not the optimal solution. Hence, in order to obtain the optimal discriminant function for the received data, the effect of these random factors must be integrated out, i.e., (11) where represents the height of the sensor from the target, and represent the horizontal position of the sensor relative to the center of the target, and are the a priori distributions of the position factors, and where is the model prediction (described in detail in Section III) of the th target response when it is located at the position ( ) relative to the sensor.…”
Section: Forward Model-based Bayesian Classifier Formulationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In this case, the previously derived processor [as in (10)], which assumed a "fixed" target/sensor orientation, is not the optimal solution. Hence, in order to obtain the optimal discriminant function for the received data, the effect of these random factors must be integrated out, i.e., (11) where represents the height of the sensor from the target, and represent the horizontal position of the sensor relative to the center of the target, and are the a priori distributions of the position factors, and where is the model prediction (described in detail in Section III) of the th target response when it is located at the position ( ) relative to the sensor.…”
Section: Forward Model-based Bayesian Classifier Formulationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The features that are important in all sensing methods are low power consumption, low price, being unaffected by environmental changes, high precision, high reliability and stability. Some remote sensing methods used from past to present include electromagnetic induction (EMI) [1][2][3][4][5], ground effect radar (GPR) [6][7][8][9][10][11] and magnetic anomaly [12][13][14][15]18]. Magnetic anomaly is the most widely used remote sensing method due to its low price, low number of equipment and changeable sensitivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As attention has focused on it, suggestive studies have been performed and new instruments developed [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. Unfortunately, omnipresent metallic clutter at UXO cleanup sites complicates matters because EMI devices are essentially metal detectors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%