1997
DOI: 10.1145/278245.278247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Object normal forms and dependency constraints for object-oriented schemata

Abstract: We address the development of a normalization theory for object-oriented data models that have common features to support object identity and complex objects. We first provide an extension of functional dependencies to cope with the richer semantics of relationships between objects, called path dependency, local dependency, and global dependency constraints. Using these dependency constraints, we provide normal forms for object-oriented data models based on the notions of user interpretation (user-specified de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In an ORDB, a table may not be in the first normal form of the relational data model, and a table can be nested in another table. Various nested normal forms are studied as an extension of traditional flat normal forms in the relational data model area [26][27][28], but these extensions are based on the relational algebra and relational data model. Similar to the comparison in Table I, the RSM is different from the ORDB in foundation, managed object, data model, normalization basis, operation feature, and exchange basis.…”
Section: Comparison Between Rsm Multi-dimensional Data Model and Objmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an ORDB, a table may not be in the first normal form of the relational data model, and a table can be nested in another table. Various nested normal forms are studied as an extension of traditional flat normal forms in the relational data model area [26][27][28], but these extensions are based on the relational algebra and relational data model. Similar to the comparison in Table I, the RSM is different from the ORDB in foundation, managed object, data model, normalization basis, operation feature, and exchange basis.…”
Section: Comparison Between Rsm Multi-dimensional Data Model and Objmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ansätze wie etwa [1,12,13,20] haben bereits verschiedene Vorarbeiten geleistet, um beispielsweise spezielle Formen der Datenredundanz oder vonÄnderungsanomalien zu identifizieren und geeignete Normalformen zu finden, um diese Probleme zu beseitigen. In der Regel werden dazu die aus dem relationalen Bereich bekannten funktionalen und mehrwertigen Abhängigkeiten geeignet erweitert und darauf basierend Normalformen definiert.…”
Section: Andere Ansätzeunclassified
“…Der Ansatz von Tari et al [20] kann unter den zuvor genannten als der wohl weitreichendste angesehen werden.…”
Section: Andere Ansätzeunclassified
“…First, so-called semantic data models have been developed [29,60,94], which were originally just meant to be used as design aids, as application semantics was assumed to be easier captured by these models [10,30,96]. Later on some of these models, especially the nested relational model [64,81], object-oriented and object-relational models [12,42,44,89,90] have become interesting as data models in their own right and some dependency and normalisation theory has been carried over to these advanced data models [48Y50, 55,57,69,77,79,80,84,85,92,95]. A comparison of the various normal forms for the nested relational data model proposed in [77,79,80,84,85] can be found in [76].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%