2017
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-2-w5-707-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Object-Oriented Approach for 3d Archaeological Documentation

Abstract: ABSTRACT:Documentation on archaeological fieldworks needs to be accurate and time-effective. Many features unveiled during excavations can be recorded just once, since the archaeological workflow physically removes most of the stratigraphic elements. Some of them have peculiar characteristics which make them hardly recognizable as objects and prevent a full 3D documentation. The paper presents a suitable feature-based method to carry on archaeological documentation with a three-dimensional approach, tested on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By offering 3D models via Web3D technologies, virtual educational environments have become cheaper and more accessible [106]. With an object-oriented approach in historical research and visualisation, for example, it is helpful that 3D models are available online (for the archaeological documentation) [107].…”
Section: Three-dimensional/four-dimensional Interactive Web Publishingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By offering 3D models via Web3D technologies, virtual educational environments have become cheaper and more accessible [106]. With an object-oriented approach in historical research and visualisation, for example, it is helpful that 3D models are available online (for the archaeological documentation) [107].…”
Section: Three-dimensional/four-dimensional Interactive Web Publishingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 3D representation of irregular wall elements, ancient traces of structures corrupted by natural events such as earthquakes, floods, and even by non-careful safeguarding of the historical heritage, require a high level of knowledge of the artefact (Della Torre 2012; Cuca & Barazzetti, 2019). For this reason, HBIM models should become more beneficial for archaeology as they offer access to both geometric and archaeological information to a wider audience as well as high levels of interactivity with the users (Fazio & Lo Brutto, 2019;Georgopoulos et al,2018b;Russo et al, 2011;Valente et al, 2017).…”
Section: Related Work and Research Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A survey exclusively reproduces the upper visible surfaces of an architectural element on the archaeological scene, but not its 3D complexity of stratigraphy (Valente et al, 2017). For example, the volume of a wall is defined as a Stratigraphical Unit (SU), linked through relations of anteriority or posteriority to the walls that lean against it (more recent) or to which it leans (more ancient).…”
Section: D Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%