2014
DOI: 10.1521/bumc.2014.78.3.197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Object representation quality, therapeutic alliance, and psychotherapy process

Abstract: This is the first study to demonstrate the existence of a relationship between patient pretreatment object relations functioning as measured by the Mutuality of Autonomy (MOA) Scale and patient-rated therapeutic alliance. Specifically, MOA scores were related to a patient-rated alliance Bond score (lower, more adaptive object-relations representations were associated with a stronger alliance). In addition, higher MOA scores indicating more malevolent object relations were related to a greater use of psychodyna… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A metanalysis supports the MOA construct validity (Graceffo et al, 2014), with an aggregated validity coefficient of r = .24. In a study by Ackerman et al (2000), the MOA score was predictive of the number of psychotherapy sessions attended by patients with personality disorders. In combination with other measures, the MOA was used to individuate young male patients with eating disorders (Rothschild-Yakar et al, 2016) and to investigate the existing relationship between patient pretreatment OR and patient-rated therapeutic alliance (Sanders et al, 2014).…”
Section: Projectives and Interviewsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A metanalysis supports the MOA construct validity (Graceffo et al, 2014), with an aggregated validity coefficient of r = .24. In a study by Ackerman et al (2000), the MOA score was predictive of the number of psychotherapy sessions attended by patients with personality disorders. In combination with other measures, the MOA was used to individuate young male patients with eating disorders (Rothschild-Yakar et al, 2016) and to investigate the existing relationship between patient pretreatment OR and patient-rated therapeutic alliance (Sanders et al, 2014).…”
Section: Projectives and Interviewsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…According to Huprich and Greenberg’s review (2003), the assessment of OR has become a fundamental tool in the field of clinical research; there is an established association between the level of development of OR, adult psychopathology, and treatment outcome. Patients with a more mature ORs functioning tend to remain in therapy (Ackerman et al, 2000), to rate the working alliance as more robust (Sanders et al, 2014) and to prompt a more psychodynamic than cognitive behavioral therapy process (Sanders et al, 2014; Vaughn et al, 2021). Conversely, psychodynamic treatment seems to have a positive impact on the development and integration of ORs.…”
Section: Clinical Relevancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Les auteurs américains [18] ont recensé dans leur méta analyse à partir de Un dernier axe de recherche nous paraitrait intéressant à privilégier en mettant à l'épreuve la pertinence de notre grille dans une perspective thérapeutique. L'apport du test de Rorschach comme dispositif de médiation thérapeutique a déjà été souligné antérieurement par les cliniciens français [16,23].Mais l'utilité d'une échelle de ce type comme prédicteur de la facilité ou de la difficulté de l'engagement et de l'alliance thérapeutique, démontrée dans les travaux anglo saxons réalisés avec l'échelle MOA [25], gagnerait à être testée en France, à un moment où par ailleurs, les cliniciens sont de plus en plus confrontés à la nécessité d'évaluer les effets des psychothérapies engagées [10].Des études anglo-saxonnes déjà très anciennes sur la population borderline [14]…”
Section: Autonomy)unclassified
“…In terms of the client's relationship with the therapist, as often measured by the WAI (Working Alliance Inventory) (Horvath and Greenberg, 1989), there is ample evidence that clients' object relations and the quality of their interpersonal relationships (Ollila et al, 2016) play an important role in the development of the therapeutic alliance, such that positive internal representations are related to the formation of a strong and stable working alliance (Mikulincer et al, 2013;Sanders et al, 2014), whereas negative internal representations disrupt the development of the alliance (Bernecker et al, 2014). In terms of the client-artwork relations, theorists suggest that the clients' object relations are reflected in their responses to the artistic experience with the art materials before, during, and after art-making, as well as to the product itself (Robbins, 2001;Sanders et al, 2014;Hilbuch et al, 2016). This is consistent with a previous study (Snir et al, 2017) on the relationships between attachment dimensions of anxiety and avoidance and reactions to using art materials in 409 non-client volunteers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%