2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2020.102007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Objective and automated assessment of surgical technical skills with IoT systems: A systematic literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous self tutoring frameworks, the proposed coaching was based on expert level classification or pre-recorded expert parameters such as videos, benchmarks, or milestones 9 , 33 35 . In contrast to determining feedback based on expertise group classification or static parameters, the ICEMS produces dynamic feedback for each performance metric by separate algorithms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In previous self tutoring frameworks, the proposed coaching was based on expert level classification or pre-recorded expert parameters such as videos, benchmarks, or milestones 9 , 33 35 . In contrast to determining feedback based on expertise group classification or static parameters, the ICEMS produces dynamic feedback for each performance metric by separate algorithms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work presents a technical skills continuous assessment application built using expert surgeon data, with predictive validity across a training program on surgical trainee performance 16 , 35 . This deep learning application demonstrated a granular differentiation across expertise and between resident levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While modern eye-tracking technologies are relatively inexpensive, userfriendly, unobtrusive and non-intrusive, there are still barriers for implementing eye-tracking in training and assessment reported in the literature. Several studies report costs as a barrier (Rosch & Vogel-Walcutt, 2013;Merali et al 2014;Castillo-Segura et al 2021), and several studies report challenges in taking them into use, including difficulties in selecting suitable tasks and/or uncertainty of how to measure specific skills (Fox & Faulkner-Jones, 2017;Merali et al 2017;Hermens et al 2013;Limbu et al 2018). Barriers related to difficulty in programming the equipment are also reported (Rosch & Vogel-Walcutt, 2013).…”
Section: Barriers and Benefits Reported In The Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barriers related to difficulty in programming the equipment are also reported (Rosch & Vogel-Walcutt, 2013). Moreover, studies report that eye-tracking is a rather time-consuming method, generating large data sets that need to be properly analyzed (Merali et al 2017;Castillo-Segura et al 2021). Hence, using eyetracking technologies in training and assessment is still not an off-the-shelf pedagogical method, easily available for the everyday educational practices in complex socio-technical domains.…”
Section: Barriers and Benefits Reported In The Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…During surgical training, the assessment of the technical surgical skills to be acquired by novice surgeons has traditionally been performed by expert surgeons, being a subjective assessment that may be biased. Recent advances in the Internet of Things (IoT), the ability to embed sensors in objects and environments to collect large amounts of data, and advances in machine learning allow for a more objective and automated assessment of MIS skills [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%