2013
DOI: 10.1080/15402002.2013.829062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Objective and Subjective Components of the First-Night Effect in Young Nightmare Sufferers and Healthy Participants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The confound was reduced in most of the PSG studies by disregarding data obtained during the first night of laboratory recording (eliminating “first night effects”) [23]. Interestingly, in a post-hoc assessment of studies that measured sleep objectively both at home and in the laboratory, the median difference between home and laboratory TST was only 3.2 min (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The confound was reduced in most of the PSG studies by disregarding data obtained during the first night of laboratory recording (eliminating “first night effects”) [23]. Interestingly, in a post-hoc assessment of studies that measured sleep objectively both at home and in the laboratory, the median difference between home and laboratory TST was only 3.2 min (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inconsistencies across lab-based and home-based PSG suggest possible first night lab effects [17] and/or high variability in sleep patterns. Longer assessment periods in the home environment may clarify discrepancies.…”
Section: Characterizing the Nature Of Sleep Disturbance In Youth Withmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taken together, investigations of sleep pattern differences lack comparable designs; and there is no conclusive evidence for systematically impaired sleep patterns in those who suffer from nightmares, although robust findings of reduced self‐reported sleep quality do exist (Kis et al, ; Nielsen, Paquette, Solomonova, Lara‐Carrasco, Popova, & Levrier, ; Paul et al, ; Simor et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, polysomnographic studies that investigated sleep architecture in nightmare sufferers revealed inhomogeneous results and were not able to explain the self-reported complaints. Significant differences in nightmare sufferers were presented by three studies; however, a systematic picture cannot be concluded from the altered parameters (which were less non-REM (NREM) and slow wave sleep, increased wakefulness after sleep onset, more periodic leg movements, reduced sleep efficiency, and higher sleep latency; Germain & Nielsen, 2003;Kis et al, 2014;Simor, Horvath, Gombos, Takacs, & Bodizs, 2012). After investigating cyclic alternating pattern-an unspecific marker of sleep microstructure (Parrino, Ferri, Bruni, & Terzano, 2012)-results showed more disturbed NREM sleep in nightmare sufferers compared to control participants (Simor, Bódizs, Horváth, & Ferri, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%