2019
DOI: 10.1080/11356405.2019.1656485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Objective and subjective factors associated with Spanish students’ performance in science in PISA 2015 / Factores objetivos y subjetivos asociados al rendimiento del alumnado español en ciencias en PISA 2015

Abstract: This study aims to evaluate the real effect of students' subjective and emotional spheres on academic performance in science and to compare it with other objective and structural factors. The Spanish sample is made up of 6,736 15-year-old students who participated in the PISA 2015 study. In order to evaluate the relationship between the different variables, a confirmatory factor analysis was performed and a structural equations model was constructed and evaluated. The importance of the subjective and emotional… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sense, our findings are in line with those reported by Antonelli-Ponti et al (2021) who pointed out a positive relationship between parental support and students' mathematical literacy and with those highlighted by Rusteholz and Mediavilla (2022) in pointing out that bullying harms mathematical achievement. In addition, school climate, as measured in the present work in accordance with student perceptions of competitiveness and cooperation, was demonstrated to have a meaningful impact on the outcomes obtained by students in Mathematics, as proved by Gil-Madrona et al (2019) in the area of science.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…In this sense, our findings are in line with those reported by Antonelli-Ponti et al (2021) who pointed out a positive relationship between parental support and students' mathematical literacy and with those highlighted by Rusteholz and Mediavilla (2022) in pointing out that bullying harms mathematical achievement. In addition, school climate, as measured in the present work in accordance with student perceptions of competitiveness and cooperation, was demonstrated to have a meaningful impact on the outcomes obtained by students in Mathematics, as proved by Gil-Madrona et al (2019) in the area of science.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…In this sense, our findings are in line with those reported by Antonelli-Ponti et al (2021) who pointed out a positive relationship between parental support and students’ mathematical literacy and with those highlighted by Rusteholz and Mediavilla (2022) in pointing out that bullying harms mathematical achievement. In addition, school climate, as measured in the present work in accordance with student perceptions of competitiveness and cooperation, was demonstrated to have a meaningful impact on the outcomes obtained by students in Mathematics, as proved by Gil-Madrona et al (2019) in the area of science.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Another variable in the school environment that significantly influences student literacy according to studies based on the analysis of PISA data is the classroom climate ( Ruíz de Miguel, 2009 ; de Jorge-Moreno, 2016 ). In Spain, the work of Gil-Madrona et al (2019) , based on the analysis of PISA 2015 data, found that while students’ anxiety had a negative impact on their science literacy, their sense of belonging to the school and cooperation among students had a positive impact. On the other hand, Rusteholz and Mediavilla (2022) showed bullying to have a negative impact on the literacy in all of the areas evaluated by the PISA in 2018.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to TIMSS, both Scandinavian countries have achieved average PISA science achievement scores that were both below (2009in Sweden, 2006 and above ( , 20152015 in Norway) the international PISA average (which varies between administrations). However, there is a notable difference in trends of their scores.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Not all students participate in large-scale assessments like TIMSS and PISA, but most participate in national assessments of their achievements in various subjects and teacher-based tests. There are also indications that tests have some negative consequences, as there is limited time for learning in school, and tests raise students' stress levels which is also highlighted in PISA 2015 by focusing on students' well-being (OECD, 2017a) as well as in research based on PISA 2015 (see, e.g., Gil-Madrona et al, 2019). Thus, it is crucial to ensure that the assessment instruments (subject tests and questionnaires) provide reliable and useful information about the concepts and abilities they are intended to measure in order to promote equitable school development and student success.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%