2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11548-019-02073-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Objective classification of psychomotor laparoscopic skills of surgeons based on three different approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides public datasets, studies reported assessment on private datasets collected using the dVSS, simulators, sensors, and cameras. 5456,58,60…”
Section: Review Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Besides public datasets, studies reported assessment on private datasets collected using the dVSS, simulators, sensors, and cameras. 5456,58,60…”
Section: Review Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides public datasets, studies reported assessment on private datasets collected using the dVSS, simulators, sensors, and cameras. [54][55][56]58,60 Following our analysis, we found 5 studies out of 25 that acquired data virtually using simulators. In addition, 15 papers, including the JIGSAWS studies, were robotic, and 4 were of laparoscopic surgery.…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first category is tool-related and makes up the majority of the literature. Methods in this category rely on tool motion data from various sources, including video object tracking or detection [24,5,44], video spatiotemporal descriptors [65,64,62,7], robotic kinematics [63,55,15,9], external sensors [13,4,23], and virtual reality interfaces [25]. The second category is proxy-related.…”
Section: Automatic Surgical Skill Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Simball Box or research and development results like TrEndo provide skill assessment by instrument tracking, continuous attachment of instruments restrict alterations of the training setup and can interfere training through altered instrument handling [7][8][9]. Analyzing multiple motion analysis parameters (MAP) through instrument tracking with additional sensors or colored markers and image analysis pose smaller influences on the tools' characteristic behavior, yet, are inefficient due to instrument modification and simulator-dependent software adjustments [10][11][12][13][14]. Determining instrument positions and angles by edge detection alone forgoes the problem entirely, the necessary image processing increases the complexity of the system, decreases reliability in altered circumstances, and decreases portability to different phantom trainers [15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%