1999
DOI: 10.1097/00006250-199903000-00014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Objective Diagnosis of Micrognathia in the Fetus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Paladini et al and Mermans et al showed that the Jaw Index is a reliable instrument to assess the objective size of the lower jaw in newborns [ 51 , 52 ]. In this study, patients with RS showed a significantly increased index connected with a smaller mandibula and an increased overjet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paladini et al and Mermans et al showed that the Jaw Index is a reliable instrument to assess the objective size of the lower jaw in newborns [ 51 , 52 ]. In this study, patients with RS showed a significantly increased index connected with a smaller mandibula and an increased overjet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrasound measurements of the fetal face were reviewed and assessed for features previously reported to be associated with diagnosis of micrognathia and the need for intubation within 24 h. Specifically, we evaluated available imaging for a jaw index lower than 24 (5th percentile, a highly sensitive value 22,23 associated with need for intubation within 24 h of life 3,6,7,23,24 ), an inferior facial angle of less than 50° (which has been reported as 100% sensitive with a positive predictive value for diagnosis of micrognathia of 75%), 3,22 a frontal nasomental angle measurement of less than or equal to 140° (which is considered diagnostic for micrognathia), and severely decreased frontal nasomental angles between 100 and 134° (which is associated with more severe cases) 22,25 . Details regarding calculations of these facial measurements are well‐described in the literature 7,22,23,25 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22,25 Details regarding calculations of these facial measurements are well-described in the literature. 7,22,23,25 Other nonspecific findings on imaging that supported the prenatal diagnosis included any of the following: airway narrowing at the level of the oropharynx, polyhydramnios, abnormal appearance of fetal swallowing, or abnormal size of the gastric bubble. 3,7 There was no statistical power analysis conducted prior to the study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5. Mandibular length-Mandibular length adjusted for gestational age or fetal biometry (like femur length), seems to be another sensitive and reliable prenatal method for assessment of fetal jaw development [5,6,9,12]. Specific charts provide mean values and 95% intervals for mandibular length according gestational age or femur length [13].…”
Section: Diagnostic Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%