2013
DOI: 10.1038/eye.2013.266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Objective evaluation of refractive data and astigmatism: quantification and analysis

Abstract: The aim of this study was to present methods to improve the analysis of refractive data.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22 If they are treated independently as vectors, this leads to or (+2/+2 90 ) + (+1/+1 180 ) = +4/+1 90 , which is the correct result. 22 It is evident that the space of cylinders is not closed under addition or subtraction (ie, a cylinder plus a cylinder does not necessarily equal a cylinder). Clearly, in any analysis of changes in refractive powers, the components need to be treated as co-variates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…22 If they are treated independently as vectors, this leads to or (+2/+2 90 ) + (+1/+1 180 ) = +4/+1 90 , which is the correct result. 22 It is evident that the space of cylinders is not closed under addition or subtraction (ie, a cylinder plus a cylinder does not necessarily equal a cylinder). Clearly, in any analysis of changes in refractive powers, the components need to be treated as co-variates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Mean astigmatism was calculated by subtracting the spherical equivalent from the refractive power. 12,22 the true effect, the cylinder subtraction method may overestimate the level of statistical significance when applied to the changes in astigmatism. In addition, it is intuitively obvious and demonstrated well by subjective clinical refraction that cylindrical and spherical lens components are not independent variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To assess the long-term safety and efficacy of SCTK, the preoperative values were compared with the last follow-up available for all patients. Refractive outcome differences were assessed by dioptric power matrix evaluation using the approach suggested by Kaye et al 11,12 Data are expressed, in this case, as mean refraction and 95% confidence intervals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refractive outcome differences were assessed by dioptric power matrix evaluation using the approach suggested by Kaye. 18 Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation refraction (sphere, cylinder, and axis).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%