2013
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0000599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Objective Load Rating of a Steel-Girder Bridge Using Structural Modeling and Health Monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the structural performance and load carrying capacity of bridges would be altered due to likely damage scenarios imposed on critical components, the ability to confidently predict the remaining service life and load rating reduction is one of the major concerns for bridge engineers. Structural model calibration is a well-documented tool that can be used for structural condition assessment and performance prediction (Cardini and DeWolfe, 2009;Santini-Bell et al, 2013). A global structural model of the bridge system will aid in both the design of the instrumentation plan, as well as serve as a tool for performance assessment, and prediction of the structural behavior once the model is calibrated using the collected structural response data.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the structural performance and load carrying capacity of bridges would be altered due to likely damage scenarios imposed on critical components, the ability to confidently predict the remaining service life and load rating reduction is one of the major concerns for bridge engineers. Structural model calibration is a well-documented tool that can be used for structural condition assessment and performance prediction (Cardini and DeWolfe, 2009;Santini-Bell et al, 2013). A global structural model of the bridge system will aid in both the design of the instrumentation plan, as well as serve as a tool for performance assessment, and prediction of the structural behavior once the model is calibrated using the collected structural response data.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long term SHM data can be integrated into a bridge management protocol to better assess the actual condition of the bridge and improve the level of service that bridge owners can provide to the traveling public. In recent years, considerable efforts have been made to explore the features that represent the highest sensitivity to structural deficiency in bridges and that can be used as a prime candidate for real-time assessment of the system response (Santini-Bell et al, 2013). The implementation of an effective pattern recognition algorithm such as the X-bar control chart analysis into the wavelet packets extracted from post-processing of the SHM data has been found promising to reliably distinguish between two different states (damaged, undamaged) of the structure.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is to say, when the load is positioned at different locations, the placement of one sensor is the same as adding one load case. This can be achieved by positioning a truck with calibrated weight at various locations along the bridges . Hence, in order to get accurate and robust estimations of EI 1 –EI 8 , it is recommended to place sensors at Nodes 2, 5, 16, 17, 9, 10, 21, and 24 together with a load positioned at various locations on the structure.…”
Section: Application Of the Compatibility Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finite Element models have been created, refined and calibrated to match the dynamic responses observed during testing (Sanayei, 2012), (Bell, 2013), (Sipple, 2014). These models served as the basis of the numerical simulations for predictions of response to vehicular loading on the bridge.…”
Section: Powder Mill Bridgementioning
confidence: 99%