2015
DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.115.016938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Objectively Measured Sedentary Time and Cardiometabolic Biomarkers in US Hispanic/Latino Adults

Abstract: Background Sedentary behavior is recognized as a distinct construct from lack of moderate-vigorous physical activity and is associated with deleterious health outcomes. Previous studies have primarily relied on self-reported data, while data on the relationship between objectively-measured sedentary time and cardiometabolic biomarkers are sparse, especially among U.S. Hispanics/Latinos. Methods and Results We examined associations of objectively-measured sedentary time (via Actical accelerometers for 7 days)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

9
129
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
9
129
3
Order By: Relevance
“…18, 20 Results were additionally adjusted for missing or incomplete accelerometer data using inverse probability weighting as previously described. 25 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18, 20 Results were additionally adjusted for missing or incomplete accelerometer data using inverse probability weighting as previously described. 25 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12] Although the research on rates of sedentary behavior is limited compared with physical activity and no guidelines currently exist for levels of sedentariness, evidence suggests that Latinos may be spending up to 74% of their waking hours engaged in sedentary behaviors, slightly higher than 70% of waking hours among the general population. 12,13 Furthermore, little is known about the different factors that may influence physical activity and sedentary behavior in Latino populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonwear time was determined using the Choi algorithm,19 defined as at least 90 consecutive minutes of zero counts, with allowance of 1 or 2 minutes of nonzero counts if no counts were detected in a 30‐minute window upstream and downstream of the 90‐minute period. An adherent day was defined as at least 10 hours of wear time, and at least 3 adherent days were required for inclusion in this analysis 9. Detailed information on accelerometer performance and adherence has been described elsewhere 20.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been described previously that adherence rates in the HCHS/SOL study differed by sex, age, marital status, and other covariates 20. In order to mitigate the influence of selection bias on our results and to account for missing or incomplete accelerometer data,20 inverse probability weighting28 was implemented to weight our results to the study population as a whole, regardless of adherence status, as described previously 9. Inverse probability weighting was chosen as the ideal adjustment method in order to (1) facilitate uniform adjustment for missing data across analyses conducted at multiple study centers with various associations of interest; and (2) ease of incorporation of sampling weights and complex survey parameters while accounting for missing data using current statistical software.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation