2009
DOI: 10.1080/15228930802427114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Objectivity in Evaluations for Assisted Suicide: Appreciating the Role of Relational and Intrapsychic Components

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, approximately 45% of responding psychologists did not believe that they have sufficient training. These findings contrast with the statements made by Niederjohn and Rogers (2009), who suggested that psychologists possess the ability to assess terminally ill individuals at the end of life. One possibility for this result is that the psychologists surveyed equated confidence to the receipt of training.…”
Section: Confidence To Evaluate Perceived Competencecontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, approximately 45% of responding psychologists did not believe that they have sufficient training. These findings contrast with the statements made by Niederjohn and Rogers (2009), who suggested that psychologists possess the ability to assess terminally ill individuals at the end of life. One possibility for this result is that the psychologists surveyed equated confidence to the receipt of training.…”
Section: Confidence To Evaluate Perceived Competencecontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Further, limited training exists for psychologists to develop competency (Werth, Lewis, & Richmond, 2009). Opportunities for psychologists emerge from their experience in treating mental illness, a common occurrence at end-of-life (Wilson, Curran, & McPherson, 2005), large contributions to end-of-life research (Galbraith & Dobson, 2000), and experience providing assessments of client competency (Niederjohn & Rogers, 2009). Like psychiatrists, who are grouped with physicians for the purposes of research (Emanuel, 2002), psychologists seem to be among the most qualified professionals to provide insight and practical knowledge to the current debate (Galbraith & Dobson, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is (or should be) the role of clinical psychologists? 13 Clinical psychologists are trained to assess mental disorders and relieve mental suffering, and some are trained to evaluate decisional capacity; thus, it would seem that clinical psychologists and psychiatrists are in a position to protect patient autonomy by determining whether a requesting patient has an underlying mental disorder that impairs judgment (Niederjohn & Rogers, 2009) as well as to determine whether there are reasonable alternatives to relieve a patient's psychological suffering (Dees et al, 2013). Forensic clinical psychologists have expertise in evaluating decisional capacity in a variety of contexts (e.g., fitness to stand trial, criminal responsibility, civil forensic decision capacity; competency to be executed; Roesch & Zapf, 2013).…”
Section: Mental Disorder and Competencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, several professionals have argued it is possible and necessary to divorce one's personal values and beliefs and to be objective when practicing in a professional capacity (Bonnie, 1990;Brodsky, 1990;Brodsky, Zapf, & Boccaccini, 2001;Connell, 2008;Dietchman, Kennedy, & Beckham, 1991;Eisenberg, 2004;Murrie & Warren, 2005). Further argument is provided by Niederjohn and Rogers (2009), who note, "It is often assumed that psychologists will be objective when conducting evaluations or that current training standards will neutralize potential sources of bias" (p. 70). However, questions remain, including: Are forensic psychologists trained to strive for objectivity?…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%