2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2020.103745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oblique penetration of ogive-nosed projectile into aluminum alloy targets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The deflection of the projectile is related to the shape of the warhead, the mechanical properties of the projectile and the target, the projectile speed, the inclination angle, etc. [22,23]. Therefore, the results of vertical test can not be directly extended to oblique penetration.…”
Section: Oblique Penetration Safety Angle Test and Damage Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deflection of the projectile is related to the shape of the warhead, the mechanical properties of the projectile and the target, the projectile speed, the inclination angle, etc. [22,23]. Therefore, the results of vertical test can not be directly extended to oblique penetration.…”
Section: Oblique Penetration Safety Angle Test and Damage Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a ductile material, the use of metals has resulted in systematic progress in the research of different projectiles [28,29], cross-sectional shapes [30,31], and impact angles [32,33] during penetration. Therefore, numerical simulation methods have been widely used in ductile target plates.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Of Aluminum Projectile-target Penetrati...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the simulations show that the timing of the peak in the deceleration history coincides with the wake separation and reattachment processes during penetration. As explained by Kong et al (2014) and by Wei et al (2021), the wake separation takes place when the projectile's shank detaches from the target, and reattachment is referred to the closing of the gap between them. Note also the second (lower) peak, at about t = 65 μs, which indicates that another separation/reattachment event takes place, to a lesser extent, at this time.…”
Section: General Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%