2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2014.10.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Obliquities of “top-shaped” asteroids may not imply reshaping by YORP spin-up

Abstract: The timescales over which the YORP effect alters the rotation period and the obliquity of a small asteroid can be very different, because the corresponding torques couple to different aspects of the object's shape. For nearly axisymmetric, "top-shaped" near-Earth asteroids such as 101955 Bennu, spin timescales are an order of magnitude or more longer than obliquity timescales, which are ∼ 10 5 to 10 6 yr. The observed low obliquities (near 0• or 180 • ) of top-shaped asteroids do not constitute evidence that t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the formation of an oblate spheroid, it should not take much time (order of 10 4 -10 6 years for kilometer-sized asteroids 3,24 ) for post-processes such as YORP to lead to top shapes such as those currently observed. Dynamical studies of the spins of main belt asteroids show that YORP evolution is required to explain their distribution 25 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After the formation of an oblate spheroid, it should not take much time (order of 10 4 -10 6 years for kilometer-sized asteroids 3,24 ) for post-processes such as YORP to lead to top shapes such as those currently observed. Dynamical studies of the spins of main belt asteroids show that YORP evolution is required to explain their distribution 25 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, observations that asteroids have the expected obliquity and are top-shaped may not be sufficient to confirm the hypothesis that they were shaped by the YORP effect. It has been showed that time scales needed to reorient an asteroid that is already symmetric in shape are much shorter than that of YORP spin-up 24 . In addition, the YORP spin-up process is not linear, as small changes in the surface topography driven by asteroids' rotation can substantially vary the YORP acceleration 32 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the presence of any water ice within Bennu depends strongly on its past dynamical history. However, previous work has shown that the obliquity component of the YORP effect rapidly moves the pole of Bennu to the stable orbit‐perpendicular configuration it is in now (within ~10 5 years; Statler, ) and that there is an ~85% probability that Bennu has not approached the Sun to within 0.4 AU (Delbó & Michel, ). Resurfacing events may also erase and create new polar cold traps over time, but from equatorial crater counts Bennu's surface is estimated to be rather old at between 100 million to 1 billion years in age (Walsh et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tanga et al (2009) showed in a series of simulations, that indeed the observed distribution of axial ratios and therefore the bulk shapes of asteroid can be reproduced using a N -body approach of spherical 'pebbles' with surface friction. While this interpretation of top-shaped asteroids as being shaped by YORP induced spin-up seems conclusive, Statler (2015) cautions that the evidence is not yet without doubt. As YORP strength is strongly depending on asymmetric surface features, the amplitude of the rotational part will decrease when the bulk reshaping form exactly these top-like, symmetric shapes.…”
Section: Shape Evolution By Yorp Spin-upmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In these simulations, for low internal angles of friction no evolution of top-shaped, axisymmetric bodies could be observed. Also, the timescale of changes in obliquity, at least for nearly axisymmetric bodies, is an order of magnitude shorter than for changes in rotation rate, therefore the observed bi-modal obliquity distribution does not necessarily attribute the top-like shape to YORP spin-up (Statler 2015).…”
Section: Shape Evolution By Yorp Spin-upmentioning
confidence: 93%