2012
DOI: 10.1002/etep.1684
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observability analysis and restoration for systems with conventional and phasor measurements

Abstract: SUMMARY This paper presents an efficient and fast method, using topological and numerical procedures, for observability analysis in state estimation with phasor measurement units as well as conventional (SCADA) measurements. Power and current flow measurements are used to build topologically flow islands that, in turn, are used to construct a reduced network and an associated gain matrix. To build this reduced order gain matrix, boundary power injections, and voltage phasors at flow islands are considered. Obs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Consider a N − bus power system and a measurement set consisting of m S conventional measurements (bus voltage magnitudes, branch power flows, and bus power injections) provided by SCADA, m P phasorial measurements (bus voltage and branch current phasors) provided by PMUs, and m Z zero injections. Under the assumption that the available measurements are sufficient to make the entire system observable and compute the system‐wide state vector, the measurement model is described by an overdetermined system of linear and nonlinear equations relating measurements and unknowns (states) as follows: {right left}truezS=hSx+eS,zP=HPx+eP,Cx=0, where z S is the m S × 1 vector of SCADA measurements; z P is the m P × 1 vector of PMU measurements; h S ( x ) is the m S × 1 nonlinear vector function relating conventional measurements to states; H P is the m P × n observation matrix relating the real and imaginary components of the phasor measurements to states; x is the state vector expressed in rectangular form (the i th element xi=()EiFi of x is associated with voltage phasor Vtrue˜i=Ei+jFi of bus i , with E i and F i standing for the real and imaginary part of voltage phasor at bus i , respectively); e S ( m S × 1) and e P ( m P × 1) are the vectors of random measurement errors, assumed to be normally distributed with zero mean and covariance matrix R S and R P , respectively; C is the m Z × n measurement matrix of zero current injection busses; and n = 2 N .…”
Section: The Proposed Hse Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consider a N − bus power system and a measurement set consisting of m S conventional measurements (bus voltage magnitudes, branch power flows, and bus power injections) provided by SCADA, m P phasorial measurements (bus voltage and branch current phasors) provided by PMUs, and m Z zero injections. Under the assumption that the available measurements are sufficient to make the entire system observable and compute the system‐wide state vector, the measurement model is described by an overdetermined system of linear and nonlinear equations relating measurements and unknowns (states) as follows: {right left}truezS=hSx+eS,zP=HPx+eP,Cx=0, where z S is the m S × 1 vector of SCADA measurements; z P is the m P × 1 vector of PMU measurements; h S ( x ) is the m S × 1 nonlinear vector function relating conventional measurements to states; H P is the m P × n observation matrix relating the real and imaginary components of the phasor measurements to states; x is the state vector expressed in rectangular form (the i th element xi=()EiFi of x is associated with voltage phasor Vtrue˜i=Ei+jFi of bus i , with E i and F i standing for the real and imaginary part of voltage phasor at bus i , respectively); e S ( m S × 1) and e P ( m P × 1) are the vectors of random measurement errors, assumed to be normally distributed with zero mean and covariance matrix R S and R P , respectively; C is the m Z × n measurement matrix of zero current injection busses; and n = 2 N .…”
Section: The Proposed Hse Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since it has been assumed that the entire system is SCADA observable ( italicnullity()HSC=0 and, hence, italicnullity()HSCHP=0), the linear equations have nonsingular (full rank) coefficient matrix and can deliver a unique solution . The iterative procedure converges when max|Δ x k | < ε , where ε is a predetermined threshold.…”
Section: The Proposed Hse Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observability analysis is also considered from the optimization perspective, such as nonlinear and linear integer programming. With the wide application of phasor measurement units (PMUs) in transmission systems, some authors studied power system observability analysis with PMUs and the optimal PMU placement while considering network observability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, PMU placement is considered in several papers [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] which have demonstrated state estimation problem. Accuracy of state estimation disrespecting and employed PMU number, are the disadvantages of these methodologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [19], a method, using topological and numerical procedures is presented for observability analysis with phasor measurement units likewise conventional measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%