2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.06.077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation and modeling of dust deposition on glass tube of evacuated solar thermal collectors in Mongolia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dust deposition effects on the performance of the solar thermal collectors are neglected by assuming the glass tubes perfectly clean during the whole heating season; case (2) The dust deposition effects on the performance of the solar thermal collectors are taken into account by means of Equation 2as a function of the operating conditions. Figure 10 indicates the daily average PM10 emissions x i , the daily average wind factor y i (multiplied by 100), the daily average rain rate z 1,i and the daily average snow rate z 2,i measured by the authors in Ulaanbaatar during the period from October 2015 up to May 2016 [28] and used to run the simulations in this study in the above-mentioned case (2) with the dust deposition effects being taken into account. In the same figure, the percentage difference between the daily average glass tube transmittance including the effects of dust deposition τ w,dust (calculated based on Equation 2) and the daily average glass tube transmittance without the dust deposition effects τ w/o,dust (equal to 0.96) is reported as a function of the simulation time according to the experimental values of x i , y i , z 1,i and z 2,i :…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The dust deposition effects on the performance of the solar thermal collectors are neglected by assuming the glass tubes perfectly clean during the whole heating season; case (2) The dust deposition effects on the performance of the solar thermal collectors are taken into account by means of Equation 2as a function of the operating conditions. Figure 10 indicates the daily average PM10 emissions x i , the daily average wind factor y i (multiplied by 100), the daily average rain rate z 1,i and the daily average snow rate z 2,i measured by the authors in Ulaanbaatar during the period from October 2015 up to May 2016 [28] and used to run the simulations in this study in the above-mentioned case (2) with the dust deposition effects being taken into account. In the same figure, the percentage difference between the daily average glass tube transmittance including the effects of dust deposition τ w,dust (calculated based on Equation 2) and the daily average glass tube transmittance without the dust deposition effects τ w/o,dust (equal to 0.96) is reported as a function of the simulation time according to the experimental values of x i , y i , z 1,i and z 2,i :…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dust deposition tests were conducted between October 2015 and May 2016 under the real environmental conditions in Ulaanbaatar [28]. The experiments highlighted that the daily glass tube transmittance during the ith day τ i can be estimated by using the following formula:…”
Section: Description Of the Solar Thermal Collectors Circuitmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The dust deposition behavior on glass tubes of an evacuated tube solar collector was investigated by the authors of the current study [15]. The authors conducted long-term dust deposition tests between October 2015 and May 2016; gathered environmental data such as PM 10 , rain, snow, cloud, wind speed, and direction during that period; and modeled daily change in transmittance of the glass tubes.…”
Section: Model Of Daily Change In Transmittancementioning
confidence: 99%